Clinical assessment of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection compared with RT-PCR assay for emerging variants at a high-throughput community testing site in Taiwan
•The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) B1.1.7 lineage was prevalent in April 2021 and spread into Taiwan.•The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Rapid Test Kit (ART) can detect SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variants.•ART can be used in densely populated areas for symptomatic...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of infectious diseases Vol. 115; pp. 30 - 34 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2022
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) B1.1.7 lineage was prevalent in April 2021 and spread into Taiwan.•The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Antigen Rapid Test Kit (ART) can detect SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variants.•ART can be used in densely populated areas for symptomatic or asymptomatic subjects.•ART and RT-PCR combined can improve COVID-19 diagnosis and curb community transmission.
With the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.7 lineage in the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Taiwan confronted a COVID-19 flare up in May 2021. Large-scale, accurate, affordable and rapid diagnostic tests such as the lateral flow assay can help to prevent community transmission, but their performance characteristics in real-world conditions and relevant subpopulations remain unclear.
The COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test Kit (Eternal Materials, New Taipei City, Taiwan) was used in a high-throughput community testing site; the paired reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results served as a reference for sensitivity and specificity calculations.
Of 2096 specimens tested using the rapid antigen test, 70 (3.33%) were positive and 2026 (96.7%) were negative. This clinical performance was compared with the RT-PCR results. The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen test were 76.39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.91–85.60%] and 99.26% (95% CI 98.78–99.58%), respectively, with high sensitivity in subjects with cycle threshold values ≤24. Further, the rapid antigen test detected the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage effectively.
Considering the short turnaround times and lower costs, this simple SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test for rapid screening combined with RT-PCR as a double confirmatory screening tool can facilitate the prevention of community transmission during COVID-19 emergencies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this work. |
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.034 |