Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting for Radiation-Induced Stenosis

Purpose Patients who have been irradiated at the neck have an increased risk of symptomatic stenosis of the carotid artery during follow-up. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) can be a preferable alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy, which is associated with increased operative risks...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 77; no. 5; pp. 1386 - 1390
Main Authors Dorresteijn, Lucille D.A., M.D., Ph.D, Vogels, Oscar J.M., M.D., Ph.D, de Leeuw, Frank-Erik, M.D., Ph.D, Vos, Jan-Albert, M.D., Ph.D, Christiaans, Marleen H., M.D, Ackerstaff, Rob G.A., M.D., Ph.D, Kappelle, Arnoud C., M.D., Ph.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose Patients who have been irradiated at the neck have an increased risk of symptomatic stenosis of the carotid artery during follow-up. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) can be a preferable alternative treatment to carotid endarterectomy, which is associated with increased operative risks in these patients. Methods and Materials We performed a prospective cohort study of 24 previously irradiated patients who underwent CAS for symptomatic carotid stenosis. We assessed periprocedural and nonprocedural events including transient ischemic attack (TIA), nondisabling stroke, disabling stoke, and death. Patency rates were evaluated on duplex ultrasound scans. Restenosis was defined as a stenosis of >50% at the stent location. Results Periprocedural TIA rate was 8%, and periprocedural stroke (nondisabling) occurred in 4% of patients. After a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (range, 0.3–11.0 years), only one ipsilateral incident event (TIA) had occurred (4%). In 12% of patients, a contralateral incident event was present: one TIA (4%) and two strokes (12%, two disabling strokes). Restenosis was apparent in 17%, 33%, and 42% at 3, 12, and 24 months, respectively, although none of the patients with restenosed vessels became symptomatic. The length of the irradiation to CAS interval proved the only significant risk factor for restenosis. Conclusions The results of CAS for radiation-induced carotid stenosis are favorable in terms of recurrence of cerebrovascular events at the CAS site.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.045