Is there shared decision making when the provider makes a recommendation?
Abstract Objective To compare the amount of shared decision making in breast cancer surgery interactions when providers do and do not make a treatment recommendation. Methods We surveyed breast cancer survivors who were eligible for mastectomy and lumpectomy. Patients reported whether the provider m...
Saved in:
Published in | Patient education and counseling Vol. 90; no. 1; pp. 69 - 73 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ireland
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01.01.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective To compare the amount of shared decision making in breast cancer surgery interactions when providers do and do not make a treatment recommendation. Methods We surveyed breast cancer survivors who were eligible for mastectomy and lumpectomy. Patients reported whether the provider made a recommendation and the recommendation given. They completed items about their interaction including discussion of options, pros, cons, and treatment preference. A total involvement score was calculated with higher scores indicating more shared decision making. Results Most patients (85%) reported that their provider made a recommendation. Patients who did not receive a recommendation had higher involvement scores compared to those who did (52% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.004). Type of recommendation was associated with involvement. Patients given different recommendations had the highest total involvement scores followed by those who received mastectomy and lumpectomy recommendations (65.5% vs. 42.5% vs. 33.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusion Providers were less likely to present a balanced view of the options when they gave a recommendation for surgery. Patients who received a recommendation for lumpectomy had the lowest involvement score. Practice implications Providers need to discuss both mastectomy and lumpectomy and elicit patients’ goals and treatment preferences regardless of whether or not a recommendation is given. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0738-3991 1873-5134 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.016 |