Implications of two-stage depression screening for identifying persons with thoughts of self-harm

Abstract Objective Persons with thoughts of self-harm may need evaluation for suicide risk. We examine the prevalence of thoughts of self-harm and whether persons with thoughts of self-harm are identified when two-stage depression screening is used. Methods Data are from the 2005–2010 National Healt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeneral hospital psychiatry Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 119 - 123
Main Authors Pratt, Laura A., Ph.D, Brody, Debra J., M.P.H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.01.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective Persons with thoughts of self-harm may need evaluation for suicide risk. We examine the prevalence of thoughts of self-harm and whether persons with thoughts of self-harm are identified when two-stage depression screening is used. Methods Data are from the 2005–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Persons responding positively to question nine of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) are identified as having thoughts of self-harm. We compare two depression cutoff scores for the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) to see what percentage of persons with thoughts of self-harm would be identified as needing further screening with the PHQ-9. Results The prevalence of thoughts of self-harm was 3.5%. Persons 12–17 years old, poor and reporting fair or poor health were more likely to report thoughts of self-harm. A cutoff score of three on the PHQ-2 identified 49% of persons with thoughts of self-harm for further screening with the PHQ-9. A cut point of two increased the proportion of persons with thoughts of self-harm continuing for further screening to 76%. Conclusions Using a lower cutoff score, two, the PHQ-2 captures more persons with thoughts of self-harm. One quarter of persons with self-harm thoughts may not be identified for further screening when two-stage screening is used.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0163-8343
1873-7714
DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.09.007