Variable escape from X-chromosome inactivation: Identifying factors that tip the scales towards expression

• Published in: BioEssays Vol. 36; no. 8; pp. 746 - 756
• Main Authors: Peeters, Samantha B., Cotton, Allison M., Brown, Carolyn J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2014; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: allelic imbalance; Animals; boundary elements; Chromosomes; Chromosomes, Human, X - genetics; Chromosomes, Human, X - ultrastructure; DNA Methylation; dosage compensation; epigenetic marks; Evolution, Molecular; Gene Expression; Genes; Genes, X-Linked; Humans; Inactivation; Prospects & Overviews; RNA-seq; Topology; waystations; X Chromosome Inactivation; XIST; waystations; RNA-seq; boundary elements; XIST; allelic imbalance; dosage compensation; epigenetic marks
• ISSN: 0265-9247; 1521-1878; 1521-1878
• DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400032

In humans over 15% of X‐linked genes have been shown to ‘escape’ from X‐chromosome inactivation (XCI): they continue to be expressed to some extent from the inactive X chromosome. Mono‐allelic expression is anticipated within a cell for genes subject to XCI, but random XCI usually results in expression of both alleles in a cell population. Using a study of allelic expression from cultured lymphoblasts and fibroblasts, many of which showed substantial skewing of XCI, we recently reported that the expression of genes lies on a contiunuum between those that are subject to inactivation, and those that escape. We now review allelic expression studies from mouse, and discuss the variability in escape seen in both humans and mice in genic expression levels, between X chromosomes and between tissues. We also discuss current knowledge of the heterochromatic features, DNA elements and three‐dimensional topology of the inactive X that contribute to the balance of expression from the otherwise inactive X chromosome. Incomplete transcriptional silencing of X‐chromosome inactivation (XCI) results in some genes being variably expressed from the inactive X, with differences seen between females and between tissues. The variable expression likely reflects the impact of factors contributing to XCI, including DNA sequences, chromatin features, and 3D architecture of the chromosome.