考虑吸附滞后效应的煤层气藏物质平衡方程建立及应用

目前的煤层气藏物质平衡方程忽略了煤层气吸附-解吸实验中的吸附滞后现象,大多基于煤层气吸附与解吸过程完全可逆的认识所建立的,与实际煤层气藏的排水—降压—解吸开采过程明显不符,从而无法有效指导煤层气藏的开发规划决策或后续开发方案调整。基于煤层气的吸附滞后现象分析,提出了吸附滞后效应概念,进而建立考虑吸附滞后效应影响的煤层气藏物质平衡方程,并将其应用于某煤层气藏的原始地质储量、可采储量和采收率等评价指标预测。实例应用表明,采用物质平衡方法确定煤层气藏地质储量时,若忽略煤层气的吸附滞后效应,采用吸附等温曲线参数将可能会低估煤层气藏的地质储量值却高估采收率值,造成巨大的预测误差;与之相反,采用考虑吸附滞...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in煤炭学报 Vol. 42; no. 10; pp. 2662 - 2669
Main Author 张先敏;冯其红;张纪远;胡秋嘉;樊彬
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东青岛,266580%华北油田山西煤层气勘探开发分公司,山西长治,062552 2017
Subjects
可采储量
吸附滞后
煤层气
物质平衡方程
采收率
coalbed methane
material balance equations
adsorption hysteresis
煤层气
recovery factor
吸附滞后
采收率
物质平衡方程
可采储量
recoverable reserves
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0253-9993
DOI10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0234

Cover

More Information
Summary:目前的煤层气藏物质平衡方程忽略了煤层气吸附-解吸实验中的吸附滞后现象,大多基于煤层气吸附与解吸过程完全可逆的认识所建立的,与实际煤层气藏的排水—降压—解吸开采过程明显不符,从而无法有效指导煤层气藏的开发规划决策或后续开发方案调整。基于煤层气的吸附滞后现象分析,提出了吸附滞后效应概念,进而建立考虑吸附滞后效应影响的煤层气藏物质平衡方程,并将其应用于某煤层气藏的原始地质储量、可采储量和采收率等评价指标预测。实例应用表明,采用物质平衡方法确定煤层气藏地质储量时,若忽略煤层气的吸附滞后效应,采用吸附等温曲线参数将可能会低估煤层气藏的地质储量值却高估采收率值,造成巨大的预测误差;与之相反,采用考虑吸附滞后效应的煤层气藏物质平衡方程确定的气藏地质储量值及平均含水饱和度变化值与实际值之间的误差较小,说明了所构建的煤层气藏物质平衡方程的有效性和正确性,可准确地评价煤层气藏的可采储量和采收率评价指标,对于煤层气藏后续开发规划实施和开发方案调整具有积极的指导作用。
Bibliography:Previous material balance equations（ MBEs） were established under the assumption that the adsorption and desorption process of coalbed methane（ CBM） is completely reversible and the adsorption hysteresis phenomenon observed in CBM adsorption/desorption experiment was neglected,which is obviously not consistent with the actual depressurization process of CBM reservoirs by water drainage. This paper proposed the concept of adsorption hysteresis effect based on laboratory observation and analysis of the potential mechanisms. Furthermore,an improved MBE model of CBM reservoirs considering the adsorption hysteresis effect was established,and it was applied in predicting the original gas in place（ OGIP）,recoverable reserves and recovery factor of some actual CBM reservoir. The results show that MBEs may significantly underestimate the OGIP while overestimating the recovery factor if the adsorption hysteresis effect is not included in the calculations. Conversely,the calculated OGIP and average water saturation are
ISSN:0253-9993
DOI:10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0234