Continued Effectiveness of Relapse Prevention Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Following Fluoxetine Treatment in Youth With Major Depressive Disorder

Objective To evaluate the continued effect of a sequential treatment strategy (fluoxetine followed by continued medication plus relapse prevention cognitive-behavioral therapy [RP-CBT]) on relapse prevention beyond the treatment phase. Method Youth (aged 8–17 years) with major depressive disorder (M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 54; no. 12; pp. 991 - 998
Main Authors Emslie, Graham J., MD, Kennard, Betsy D., PsyD, Mayes, Taryn L., MS, Nakonezny, Paul A., PhD, Moore, Jarrette, MA, Jones, Jessica M., MA, Foxwell, Aleksandra A., PhD, King, Jessica, BA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2015
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To evaluate the continued effect of a sequential treatment strategy (fluoxetine followed by continued medication plus relapse prevention cognitive-behavioral therapy [RP-CBT]) on relapse prevention beyond the treatment phase. Method Youth (aged 8–17 years) with major depressive disorder (MDD) were treated with fluoxetine for 6 weeks. Responders (≥50% reduction on the Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised [CDRS-R]) were randomized to continued medication management alone (MM) or continued medication management plus RP-CBT (MM+CBT) for an additional 6 months. Long-term follow-up assessments were conducted at weeks 52 and 78. Results Of 144 youth randomized to MM (n = 69) or MM+CBT (n = 75), 67% had at least 1 follow-up assessment, with equal rates in the 2 groups. Remission rates were high, although most had remitted during the 30-week treatment period. Only 6 additional participants remitted during long-term follow-up, and there were no differences on time to remission between MM+CBT and MM. The MM+CBT group had a significantly lower risk of relapse than the MM group throughout the 78-week follow-up period (hazard ratio = 0.467, 95% CI = 0.264 to 0.823; χ2  = 6.852, p  = .009). The estimated probability of relapse during the 78-week period was lower with MM+CBT than MM only (36% versus 62%). Mean time to relapse was also significantly longer with MM+CBT compared to MM alone by approximately 3 months ( p  = .007). Conclusion The addition of RP-CBT after acute response to medication management had a continued effect on reducing risk of relapse even after the end of treatment. Clinical trial registration information —Sequential Treatment of Pediatric MDD to Increase Remission and Prevent Relapse; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; NCT00612313.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-8567
1527-5418
DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2015.09.014