Growth and crown architecture of two aspen genotypes exposed to interacting ozone and carbon dioxide
Ozone decreased wood strength caused terminals and long shoots to droop and increased the branch angle of termination. To study the impact of ozone (O 3) and O 3 plus CO 2 on aspen growth, we planted two trembling aspen clones, differing in sensitivity to O 3, in the ground in open-top chambers and...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental pollution (1987) Vol. 115; no. 3; pp. 319 - 334 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2001
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ozone decreased wood strength caused terminals and long shoots to droop and increased the branch angle of termination.
To study the impact of ozone (O
3) and O
3 plus CO
2 on aspen growth, we planted two trembling aspen clones, differing in sensitivity to O
3, in the ground in open-top chambers and exposed them to different concentrations of O
3 and O
3 plus CO
2 for 98 days. Ozone exposure (58 to 97 μl1
−1-h, total exposure) decreased growth and modified crown architecture of both aspen clones. Ozone exposure decreased leaf, stem, branch, and root dry weight particularly in the O
3 sensitive clone (clone 259). The addition of CO
2 (150 μl1
−1 over ambient) to the O
3 exposure counteracted the negative impact of O
3 only in the O
3 tolerant clone (clone 216). Ozone had relatively little effect on allometric ratios such as, shoot/ root ratio, leaf weight ratio, or root weight ratio. In both clones, however, O
3 decreased the shoot dry weight/shoot length ratio and shoot diameter. This decrease in wood strength caused both current terminals and long shoots to droop and increased the branch angle of termination. These results show that aspen growth is highly sensitive to O
3 and that O
3 can also significantly affect crown architecture. Aspen plants with drooping terminals and lateral branches would be at a competitive disadvantage in dense stands with limited light. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00225-1 |