Subliminal Instrumental Conditioning Demonstrated in the Human Brain

• Published in: Neuron (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 561 - 567
• Main Authors: Pessiglione, Mathias, Petrovic, Predrag, Daunizeau, Jean, Palminteri, Stefano, Dolan, Raymond J., Frith, Chris D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 28.08.2008; Elsevier Limited; Cell Press
• Subjects: Adult; Association Learning - physiology; Attention - physiology; Awareness - physiology; Behavior; Brain Mapping; Brain research; Choice Behavior - physiology; Conditioning, Operant - physiology; Consciousness - physiology; Decision making; Decision Making - physiology; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology; Experiments; Female; Humans; Intuition - physiology; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medical imaging; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Neostriatum - physiology; Perceptual Masking - physiology; Reference Values; Scanners; Scholarships & fellowships; Subconscious; Subliminal Stimulation; SYSNEURO; Visual Cortex - physiology; SYSNEURO
• ISSN: 0896-6273; 1097-4199; 1097-4199
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.005

How the brain uses success and failure to optimize future decisions is a long-standing question in neuroscience. One computational solution involves updating the values of context-action associations in proportion to a reward prediction error. Previous evidence suggests that such computations are expressed in the striatum and, as they are cognitively impenetrable, represent an unconscious learning mechanism. Here, we formally test this by studying instrumental conditioning in a situation where we masked contextual cues, such that they were not consciously perceived. Behavioral data showed that subjects nonetheless developed a significant propensity to choose cues associated with monetary rewards relative to punishments. Functional neuroimaging revealed that during conditioning cue values and prediction errors, generated from a computational model, both correlated with activity in ventral striatum. We conclude that, even without conscious processing of contextual cues, our brain can learn their reward value and use them to provide a bias on decision making.