Role of Perforating Artery Pedicled Neurotrophic Flap in the Treatment of Compound Tissue Defect of Tibia Using the Ilizarov Technique

• Published in: Orthopaedic surgery Vol. 14; no. 7; pp. 1294 - 1299
• Main Authors: Wu, Yuan‐jian, Zhang, Yu‐bo, Hamushan, Musha, Zhang, Wen‐jun, Zhang, Tao, Li, Xu‐jun, Han, Pei, Lou, Teng‐fei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.07.2022; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Amputation; Antibiotics; Clinical; Compound defect; Debridement; Fractures; Ilizarov technique; Infections; Injuries; Patients; Pedicled flap; Reconstruction; Skin & tissue grafts; Surgeons; Surgery; Surgical techniques; Tibia; Tomography; Transplants & implants; Veins & arteries; Reconstruction; Pedicled flap; Tibia; Compound defect; Ilizarov technique
• ISSN: 1757-7853; 1757-7861
• DOI: 10.1111/os.13309

Objective To describe our experience with the combined use of pedicled neurotrophic flap and distraction osteogenesis in the management of complex lower extremity injuries with composite bone and soft tissue defects and assess the functional and cosmetic results of this method. Methods A pedicled flap with a marked perforator artery was applied for soft tissue coverage after radical debridement and temporary external fixation. In the second stage, the Ilizarov external fixator was used in place of the temporary external fixator for reconstruction of the segmental bone defect by distraction osteogenesis. Twenty‐five patients (16 men and nine women; mean age, 39.2 years) were treated by using this combined technique between 2008 and 2016. All cases were graded initially as Gustilo–Anderson grade IIIB open fractures. The soft tissue defect after radical debridement ranged from 9 cm × 5 cm to 14 cm × 11 cm, and the average size of segmental defect was 5.2 (Range, 2.5–8.5) cm. Seventeen of these patients had a history of local infection. The bone structure and function were evaluated by two independent evaluators using Paley's criteria. Results Twenty‐five patients were followed up for an average of 28.96 (Range, 15–48) months. The distally based sural neurovascular flap was applied in 13 patients, and the greater saphenous neurocutaneous perforator flap in 12 patients. The flap area ranged from 10 cm × 5 cm to 14 cm × 12 cm. Sufficient coverage of soft tissue defect was achieved in all cases. All flaps survived completely without complications. The bone defects were corrected by a mean lengthening of 6.94 (Range, 4.5–9.5) cm. The residual discrepancy was <1 cm in all cases, which was not clinically significant. The function was evaluated as excellent in 12 patients and good in 13 patients. Bone results were graded as excellent in 18 patients and good in seven patients. Complications during treatment included pain, pin tract infections, ankle midfoot joint stiffness, and docking site nonunion. No recurrence of infection was observed in infected patients. All cases achieved successful limb salvage and satisfactory function recovery without recurrence of infection. Conclusions The combined technique of a perforator artery pedicled neurotrophic flap and distraction osteogenesis is an effective alternative approach in the salvage treatment of massively traumatized and chronically infected lower extremities. The combined technique of a perforator artery pedicled neurotrophic flap and distraction osteogenesis is an effective method in the salvage treatment of the massively traumatized and chronically infected lower extremity.