Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended‐depth‐of‐focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study

Purpose To evaluate differences in subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended‐depth‐of‐focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) using echelette optics, and the effect of the light wavelength used during examinations. Methods In the prospective study, subjective and objective refractions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) Vol. 99; no. 6; pp. e837 - e843
Main Authors Ota, Yuka, Minami, Keiichiro, Oki, Shinichi, Bissen‐Miyajima, Hiroko, Okamoto, Keiichiro, Nakashima, Masaya, Tsubota, Kazuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To evaluate differences in subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended‐depth‐of‐focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) using echelette optics, and the effect of the light wavelength used during examinations. Methods In the prospective study, subjective and objective refractions of 128 eyes of 64 patients were examined 3 months after implantation of the EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V, Johnson & Johnson Surgival Vision). Objective refractions were measured using an autorefractor with a near‐infrared (NIR) light source. Clinical differences in the spherical, cylindrical and spherical equivalent (SE) refractions between the subjective and objective refractions were evaluated. Then, lens powers of monofocal, EDOF and diffractive bifocal IOLs in the use of a 850‐nm light source were measured experimentally for using a lensmeter, and the differences from the monofocal IOLs were calculated. Results The mean objective refractions were more myopic (p < 0.001) than the subjective refractions; the differences in the spherical, cylindrical and SE refractions were −0.71, −0.26 and −0.84 dioptre, respectively. Experimental investigation resulted that there was the mean difference of 0.83 D with the EDOF from monofocal IOLs at 850 nm, while the difference was −0.20 D with bifocal IOLs. Conclusions The diffractive EDOF IOLs using echelette gratings inherently induced constant differences in the subjective and objective refractions, which arose from the chromatic difference in IOL powers for the visible and NIR lights.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Acknowledgements: We thank Mr. Young Hyun Kim of Tomey Corporation for assisting with the modification of a lensmeter and measurements.
Funding: The study was supported in part by Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision.
Conflict of interest: Minami: AMO Japan K.K, Japan (consulting); Alcon Japan Ltd, Japan (consulting); Tomey Corporation, Japan (patent pending). Bissen‐Miyajima: Alcon (consulting, lectures); Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision (consulting, lectures); Zeiss (consulting); Santen (consulting, lectures); HOYA (consulting, lectures). Okamoto and Nakashima: Tomey Corporation, Japan (employment). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/aos.14660