Effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing HIV acquisition and transmission among gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in high income settings: A systematic review

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 10; p. e0276209
• Main Authors: Sewell, Janey, Fakoya, Ibidun, Lampe, Fiona C, Howarth, Alison, Phillips, Andrew, Burns, Fiona, Rodger, Alison J, Cambiano, Valentina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 19.10.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; Bisexual; Bisexuality; Confidence intervals; Contingency; Counseling; Demographic aspects; Disease prevention; Disease transmission; Effectiveness; Gays & lesbians; Gender; Health aspects; Health risks; High income; HIV; HIV infection; Human immunodeficiency virus; Income; Intervention; Medical diagnosis; Medicine and health sciences; Men; Mens health; Minority & ethnic groups; MSM (Men who have sex with men); Population; Prevention; Prophylaxis; Quality assessment; Research and Analysis Methods; Reviews; Risk; Risk factors; Risk taking; Sexual behavior; Sexual partners; Sexually transmitted diseases; STD; Substance use; Systematic review; Target acquisition; Validity; United Kingdom; United States > US
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276209

Introduction HIV transmission continues among gay and bisexual men who have sex with men (GBMSM), with those who are younger, or recent migrants, or of minority ethnicity or who are gender diverse remaining at increased risk. We aimed to identify and describe recent studies evaluating the effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions for GBMSM in high income countries. Methods We searched ten electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), conducted in high income settings, and published since 2013 to update a previous systematic review (Stromdahl et al, 2015). We predefined four outcome measures of interest: 1) HIV incidence 2) STI incidence 3) condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) (or measure of CLAI) and 4) number of sexual partners. We used the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) Quality Appraisal of Intervention Studies tool to assess the quality of papers included in the review. As the trials contained a range of effect measures (e.g. odds ratio, risk difference) comparing the arms in the RCTs, we converted them into standardized effect sizes (SES) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We identified 39 original papers reporting 37 studies. Five intervention types were identified: one-to-one counselling (15 papers), group interventions (7 papers), online interventions (9 papers), Contingency Management for substance use (2 papers) and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) (6 papers). The quality of the studies was mixed with over a third of studies rated as high quality and 11% rated as poor quality. There was some evidence that one-to-one counselling, group interventions (4–10 participants per group) and online (individual) interventions could be effective for reducing HIV transmission risk behaviours such as condomless anal intercourse. PrEP was the only intervention that was consistently effective at reducing HIV incidence. Conclusions Our systematic review of the recent evidence that we were able to analyse indicates that PrEP is the most effective intervention for reducing HIV acquisition among GBMSM. Targeted and culturally tailored behavioural interventions for sub-populations of GBMSM vulnerable to HIV infection and other STIs should also be considered, particularly for GBMSM who cannot access or decline to use PrEP.