Environmental filtering of body size and darker coloration in pollinator communities indicate thermal restrictions on bees, but not flies, at high elevations

• Published in: PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 7; p. e7867
• Main Authors: McCabe, Lindsie M, Cobb, Neil S, Butterfield, Bradley J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States PeerJ. Ltd 14.10.2019; PeerJ, Inc; PeerJ Inc
• Subjects: Adaptation; Bees; Biodiversity; Body size; Climate Change Biology; Cold tolerance; Coloration; Ecology; Elevational gradients; Entomology; Expected values; Flies; Functional traits; Hypotheses; Insects; Pollinators; Proxy; Species; Wind; Zoology; Arizona; Body darkness; Body size; Pollinators; Elevational gradients; Functional traits; Flies; Bees
• ISSN: 2167-8359; 2167-8359
• DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7867

Bees and flies are the two most dominant pollinator taxa in mountain environments of the Southwest USA. Communities of both taxa change dramatically along elevation gradients. We examined whether bee and fly traits would also change along elevation gradients and if so, do they change in a predictable way related to a decrease in temperature as elevation increases. We used insect body size and darkness traits as proxies for energetic requirements and indicators of cold tolerance in order to assess patterns of bee and fly community trait differences along an elevation gradient. We examined 1,922 individuals of bees and flies sampled along an elevation gradient ranging from 2,400 meters to 3,200 meters and from 9.6 °C to 5.2 °C mean annual temperature. We examined bees and flies separately using community weighted means (site-level trait values weighted by species abundance) and estimates of environmental filtering (quantified as the inverse of the standardized range of trait values). Bees and flies exhibited two somewhat distinct patterns; (1) Community weighted mean body volume and darkness of bees increased sharply at the highest elevation, and the intensity of environmental filtering also increased with elevation. This was due to both a change among bee populations within a species as well as species replacement at the highest elevation. (2) Community weighted mean body volume and darkness of flies also increased moderately with increasing elevation, but did not exhibit patterns of significant environmental filtering. In fact, the intensity of environmental filtering as indicated by the range of fly body volume weakened with elevation. The increase in filter intensity at high elevations exhibited by bees suggests a significant limitation on the breadth of viable functional strategies for coping with extreme cold, at least within this regional species pool. Flies, on the other hand, do not appear to be limited by high elevations, indicating that the shift from bee to fly dominance at high elevations may be due, at least in part, to greater environmental constraints on bee adaptation to colder environments.