Ureteric stents on extraction strings: a systematic review of literature

• Published in: Urolithiasis Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 129 - 136
• Main Authors: Oliver, Rachel, Wells, Hannah, Traxer, Olivier, Knoll, Thomas, Aboumarzouk, Omar, Biyani, Chandra S., Somani, Bhaskar K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2018; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Verlag
• Subjects: Device Removal - adverse effects; Device Removal - methods; Feasibility Studies; Human health and pathology; Humans; Invited Review; Life Sciences; Medical Biochemistry; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nephrology; Pain - epidemiology; Pain - etiology; Pain Measurement; Patient Preference; Patients; Stents; Stents - adverse effects; Systematic review; Ureter - surgery; Ureteral Calculi - surgery; Ureteroscopy - adverse effects; Ureteroscopy - instrumentation; Urology; Urology and Nephrology; Extraction; String; Ureteroscopy; Ureteric; Stent
• ISSN: 2194-7228; 2194-7236; 2194-7236
• DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0898-1

Short-term ureteric stents are commonly placed after ureteroscopy. The removal usually entails having a cystoscopy, but recently, endourologists have been using stents with extraction strings attached to them for ease of removal. We wanted to conduct a systematic review of literature looking at the outcomes of ureteric stents with extraction strings attached to them. Our objective was to investigate the use, morbidity, tolerability, complications, associated cost, and patient preference of stents with extraction strings attached to them. All studies in English language (between 1990 and 2015) where stents on extraction strings were either self-removed by patients or removed by physician were included. A total of eight studies (1279 patients) were included, of which 483 (38 %) patients had extraction strings for removal. There seemed to be no overall difference in pain scores or urinary symptoms between patients with and without extraction strings, but nearly 10 % of patients suffered stent dislodgement in the group with extraction strings attached. Overall stent dwell time was lower in patients who had their stents removed via extraction strings, and majority of them were able to remove their stents at home. Our study suggests that stents with extraction strings are easy for patient self-removal and can reduce the stent dwell time for patients, thus reducing the duration of morbidity and physical and financial burden to patients. However, this must be balanced against a risk of stent dislodgement and, hence, may not be a good option in all patients.