Healthcare utilization during the first two waves of the COVID-19 epidemic in South Africa: A cross-sectional household survey
Healthcare utilization surveys contextualize facility-based surveillance data for burden estimates. We describe healthcare utilization in the catchment areas for sentinel site healthcare facilities during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a cross-sectional healthcare utilization...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 18; no. 8; p. e0290787 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Francisco
Public Library of Science
25.08.2023
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Healthcare utilization surveys contextualize facility-based surveillance data for burden estimates. We describe healthcare utilization in the catchment areas for sentinel site healthcare facilities during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a cross-sectional healthcare utilization survey in households in three communities from three provinces (KwaZulu-Natal, Western Cape and North West). Field workers administered structured questionnaires electronically with the household members reporting influenza-like illness (ILI) in the past 30 days or severe respiratory illness (SRI) since March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with healthcare utilization among individuals that reported illness. From November 2020 through April 2021, we enrolled 5804 households and 23,003 individuals. Any respiratory illness was reported by 1.6% of individuals; 0.7% reported ILI only, 0.8% reported SRI only, and 0.1% reported both ILI and SRI. Any form of medical care was sought by 40.8% (95% CI 32.9% - 49.6%) and 71.3% (95% CI 63.2% - 78.6%) of individuals with ILI and SRI, respectively. On multivariable analysis, respiratory illness was more likely to be medically attended for individuals at the Pietermaritzburg site (aOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1–9.5, compared to Klerksdorp), that were underweight (aOR 11.5, 95% CI 1.5–90.2, compared to normal weight), with underlying illness (aOR 3.2, 95%CI 1.2–8.5), that experienced severe illness (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 1.6–14.3) and those with symptom duration of ≥10 days (aOR 7.9, 95% CI 2.1–30.2, compared to <5 days). Less than half of ILI episodes and only 71% of SRI episodes were medically attended during the first two COVID-19 waves in South Africa. Facility-based data may underestimate disease burden during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interests: CC has received grant support from Sanofi Pasteur, South African Medical Research Council, The Wellcome Trust and the United Kingdom Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, PATH, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. NW and AvG have received grant support from Sanofi Pasteur, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0290787 |