Creatine-Kinase- and Exercise-Related Muscle Damage Implications for Muscle Performance and Recovery

The appearance of creatine kinase (CK) in blood has been generally considered to be an indirect marker of muscle damage, particularly for diagnosis of medical conditions such as myocardial infarction, muscular dystrophy, and cerebral diseases. However, there is controversy in the literature concerni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nutrition and metabolism Vol. 2012; no. 2012; pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors Baird, Marianne Findlay, Graham, Scott M., Baker, Julien S., Bickerstaff, Gordon F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Puplishing Corporation 01.01.2012
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The appearance of creatine kinase (CK) in blood has been generally considered to be an indirect marker of muscle damage, particularly for diagnosis of medical conditions such as myocardial infarction, muscular dystrophy, and cerebral diseases. However, there is controversy in the literature concerning its validity in reflecting muscle damage as a consequence of level and intensity of physical exercise. Nonmodifiable factors, for example, ethnicity, age, and gender, can also affect enzyme tissue activity and subsequent CK serum levels. The extent of effect suggests that acceptable upper limits of normal CK levels may need to be reset to recognise the impact of these factors. There is a need for standardisation of protocols and stronger guidelines which would facilitate greater scientific integrity. The purpose of this paper is to examine current evidence and opinion relating to the release of CK from skeletal muscle in response to physical activity and examine if elevated concentrations are a health concern.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Academic Editor: H. K. Biesalski
ISSN:2090-0724
2090-0732
2090-0732
DOI:10.1155/2012/960363