Concentrations and health risks of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury in rice and edible mushrooms in China

•Rice samples from different growing regions in China had a significant difference in Pb, Cd and As content.•In fresh edible mushroom, Pb and Hg contents in 2.6% samples were above MAC.•More than 95% rice and edible mushroom samples in our test had high edible safety. In this study, four common heav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 147; pp. 147 - 151
Main Authors Fang, Yong, Sun, Xinyang, Yang, Wenjian, Ma, Ning, Xin, Zhihong, Fu, Jin, Liu, Xiaochang, Liu, Meng, Mariga, Alfred Mugambi, Zhu, Xuefeng, Hu, Qiuhui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 15.03.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Rice samples from different growing regions in China had a significant difference in Pb, Cd and As content.•In fresh edible mushroom, Pb and Hg contents in 2.6% samples were above MAC.•More than 95% rice and edible mushroom samples in our test had high edible safety. In this study, four common heavy metals, lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg) in rice and edible mushrooms of China were studied to evaluate contamination level and edible safety. Ninety two (92) rice samples were collected from the main rice growing regions in China, and 38 fresh and 21 dry edible mushroom samples were collected from typical markets in Nanjing City. The analyzed metal concentrations were significantly different between rice and edible mushroom samples (p<0.05). The results showed that Pb, Cd and As contents in 4.3%, 3.3% and 2.2% rice samples respectively, were above maximum allowable concentration (MAC). In fresh edible mushroom, Pb and Hg contents in 2.6% samples were above MAC, respectively. However, only Hg content in 4.8% dry edible mushroom samples was above its MAC. Therefore, more than 95% rice and edible mushroom samples in our test had high edible safety.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.116