Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden

Adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis, especially if disease burden is high. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 INO-VATE trial examined the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) vs. standard of care chemotherapy (SC) among R/R AL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood cancer journal (New York) Vol. 10; no. 8; p. 81
Main Authors DeAngelo, Daniel J., Advani, Anjali S., Marks, David I., Stelljes, Matthias, Liedtke, Michaela, Stock, Wendy, Gökbuget, Nicola, Jabbour, Elias, Merchant, Akil, Wang, Tao, Vandendries, Erik, Neuhof, Alexander, Kantarjian, Hagop, O’Brien, Susan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 07.08.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL) have a poor prognosis, especially if disease burden is high. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 INO-VATE trial examined the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) vs. standard of care chemotherapy (SC) among R/R ALL patients with low, moderate, or high disease burden, respectively, defined as bone marrow blasts (BMB) < 50% ( n  = 53 vs. 48), 50–90% ( n  = 79 vs. 83), and >90% ( n  = 30 vs. 30). Patients in the InO vs. SC arm with low, moderate, and high BMB%, respectively, had improved rates of complete remission/complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (74% vs. 46% [ p  = 0.0022], 75 vs. 27% [ p  < 0.0001], and 70 vs. 17% [ p  < 0.0001]), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.64 [ p  = 0.0260], 0.81 [ p  = 0.1109], and 0.60 [ p  = 0.0335]). Irrespective of BMB%, cytopenias were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events, and post-transplant veno-occlusive disease was more common with InO vs. SC. Patients with extramedullary disease or lymphoblastic lymphoma showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes. This favorable benefit-to-risk ratio of InO treatment irrespective of disease burden supports its use in challenging and high disease burden subpopulations. INO-VATE is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov : #NCT01564784. Plain language summary Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL for short) is a type of blood cancer where the body makes too many immature white blood cells called lymphoblasts. This study involved people with ALL whose cancer had returned after, or stopped responding to, previous treatment. These people received either inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO for short) or standard chemotherapy. Researchers divided people into groups, based on the level of lymphoblast cells they had in their bone marrow (called disease burden): low, medium, or high disease burden. In this study, compared with people who received standard chemotherapy, people who received InO were more likely to have no signs of their cancer (called remission), live to the end of the study, and/or reach the end of the study without their cancer getting worse. The researchers saw these results across all disease burden groups. For people who received InO, those with high disease burden were equally as likely as those with low disease burden to achieve remission, and/or experience medical problems. For people who received standard chemotherapy, those with high disease burden were less likely than those with low disease burden to achieve remission. Further information in a plain language format is available in Supplementary Information (SI) Fig. S1.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2044-5385
2044-5385
DOI:10.1038/s41408-020-00345-8