No Caller ID for the Soul: Demonization, Charisms, and the Unstable Subject of Protestant Language Ideology

• Published in: Anthropological quarterly Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 679 - 703
• Main Author: Bialecki, Jon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Washington George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research 01.07.2011; Institute for Ethnographic Research
• Subjects: Analysis; Anthropological Linguistics; Anthropology; Anthropology of religion; BEYOND LOGOS: EXTENSIONS OF THE LANGUAGE IDEOLOGY PARADIGM IN THE STUDY OF GLOBAL CHRISTIANITY(-IES); California; Christianity; Cultural anthropology; Demonology; Discourse analysis; Ethics; Ethnography; Falwell, Jerry; Fieldwork; Gifts, Spiritual; Ideologies; Ideology; Language; Language Attitudes; Language ideologies; Language Ideology; Language policy; Language Usage; Language Use; Linguistic anthropology; Literature reviews; Luhrmann, Tanya; Prophecy; Protestantism; Protestants; Religion; Religions; Religious aspects; Religious practices; Self concept; Soul; Speech; Theology, Protestant; U.S.A; Vineyards; United States; New York; Southern California; Grand Rapids Michigan; United States > US
• ISSN: 0003-5491; 1534-1518; 1534-1518
• DOI: 10.1353/anq.2011.0034

The ethnography of Christianity has only one area where a sort of Khunian "normal science" has been achieved: Christian Language practices has been agreed on as a topic of vital and sustained ethnographic interest, and is usually understood analytically as being shaped by a referentially oriented, individuating "Christian [or, at times, Protestant] Language Ideology." Relying on a review of the ethnographic literature regarding Christian Language use, and on an impromptu deliverance from demons observed during fieldwork with "The Vineyard," a Southern California originated but now world-wide Church Planting movement, this article argues that such an understanding is not wrong, but only partially apprehends the relevant dynamics of language use. This piece posits that Christian language use can be understood by delineating two sharply contrasting, but both valued, forms of speech—"centripetal" and "centrifugal"—each of which has different implicit concerns about the importance of self-identity and the sorts of boundaries that comprise the ethical subject.