Diagnosing Insulin Resistance in the General Population

Diagnosing Insulin Resistance in the General Population Kirsten A. McAuley , MBCHB 1 , Sheila M. Williams , BSC(HONS) 2 , Jim I. Mann , DM, PHD, FRACP 1 , Robert J. Walker , MD, FRACP 3 , Nick J. Lewis-Barned , FRACP 4 , Lara A. Temple , BSC 1 and Ashley W. Duncan , BSC, NZCS 1 1 Department of Human...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes care Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 460 - 464
Main Authors McAuley, Kirsten A., Williams, Sheila M., Mann, Jim I., Walker, Robert J., Lewis-Barned, Nick J., Temple, Lara A., Duncan, Ashley W.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Alexandria, VA American Diabetes Association 01.03.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diagnosing Insulin Resistance in the General Population Kirsten A. McAuley , MBCHB 1 , Sheila M. Williams , BSC(HONS) 2 , Jim I. Mann , DM, PHD, FRACP 1 , Robert J. Walker , MD, FRACP 3 , Nick J. Lewis-Barned , FRACP 4 , Lara A. Temple , BSC 1 and Ashley W. Duncan , BSC, NZCS 1 1 Department of Human Nutrition 2 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, and 3 Department of Medicine, Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand 4 Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, U.K. Abstract OBJECTIVE —Difficulties in measuring insulin sensitivity prevent the identification of insulin-resistant individuals in the general population. Therefore, we compared fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), insulin-to-glucose ratio, Bennett index, and a score based on weighted combinations of fasting insulin, BMI, and fasting triglycerides with the euglycemic insulin clamp to determine the most appropriate method for assessing insulin resistance in the general population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —Family history of diabetes, BMI, blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, fasting lipids, glucose, insulin, liver enzymes, and insulin sensitivity index (ISI) using the euglycemic insulin clamp were obtained for 178 normoglycemic individuals aged 25–68 years. Product-moment correlations were used to examine the association between ISI and various surrogate measurements of insulin sensitivity. Regression models were used to devise weights for each variable and to identify cutoff points for individual components of the score. A bootstrap procedure was used to identify the most useful predictors of ISI. RESULTS —Correlation coefficients between ISI and fasting insulin, HOMA, insulin-to-glucose ratio, and the Bennett index were similar in magnitude. The variables that best predicted insulin sensitivity were fasting insulin and fasting triglycerides. The use of a score based on rather than the use of fasting insulin alone resulted in a higher sensitivity and a maintained specificity when predicting insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS —A weighted combination of two routine laboratory measurements, i.e., fasting insulin and triglycerides, provides a simple means of screening for insulin resistance in the general population. AST, aspartate aminotransferase BP, blood pressure HOMA, homeostasis model assessment IGT, impaired glucose tolerance ISI, insulin sensitivity index IVGTT, intravenous glucose tolerance test M, glucose disposal rate Mbw/I, ISI corrected for total body weight divided by average insulin Mffm/I, ISI corrected for fat-free mass divided by average insulin PSEP, prognostic separation index TAG, triglycerides WHR, waist-to-hip ratio Footnotes Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kirsten McAuley, Department of Human Nutrition, Otago University, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand. E-mail: kirsten.mcauley{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz . Received for publication 25 July 2000 and accepted in revised form 9 November 2000. N.J.L.-B. has received grants from the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand and the Laurensen Trust (Otago Medical Foundation). A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0149-5992
1935-5548
DOI:10.2337/diacare.24.3.460