Enhancing the Clinical Utility of Radiomics: Addressing the Challenges of Repeatability and Reproducibility in CT and MRI

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 14; no. 16; p. 1835
• Main Authors: Teng, Xinzhi, Wang, Yongqiang, Nicol, Alexander James, Ching, Jerry Chi Fung, Wong, Edwin Ka Yiu, Lam, Kenneth Tsz Chun, Zhang, Jiang, Lee, Shara Wee-Yee, Cai, Jing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.08.2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Bias; Biomarkers; Evaluation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Medical prognosis; Radiomics; repeatability and reproducibility; Reproducibility; Review; Scanners; China; repeatability and reproducibility; radiomics
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161835

Radiomics, which integrates the comprehensive characterization of imaging phenotypes with machine learning algorithms, is increasingly recognized for its potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of oncological conditions. However, the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features are critical challenges that hinder their widespread clinical adoption. This review aims to address the paucity of discussion regarding the factors that influence the reproducibility and repeatability of radiomic features and their subsequent impact on the application of radiomic models. We provide a synthesis of the literature on the repeatability and reproducibility of CT/MR-based radiomic features, examining sources of variation, the number of reproducible features, and the availability of individual feature repeatability indices. We differentiate sources of variation into random effects, which are challenging to control but can be quantified through simulation methods such as perturbation, and biases, which arise from scanner variability and inter-reader differences and can significantly affect the generalizability of radiomic model performance in diverse settings. Four suggestions for repeatability and reproducibility studies are suggested: (1) detailed reporting of variation sources, (2) transparent disclosure of calculation parameters, (3) careful selection of suitable reliability indices, and (4) comprehensive reporting of reliability metrics. This review underscores the importance of random effects in feature selection and harmonizing biases between development and clinical application settings to facilitate the successful translation of radiomic models from research to clinical practice.