Nonparametric Prediction in Measurement Error Models
Predicting the value of a variable Y corresponding to a future value of an explanatory variable X, based on a sample of previously observed independent data pairs (X 1 , Y 1 ), ..., (X n , Y n ) distributed like (X, Y), is very important in statistics. In the error-free case, where X is observed acc...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 104; no. 487; pp. 993 - 1003 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria, VA
Taylor & Francis
01.09.2009
American Statistical Association |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Predicting the value of a variable Y corresponding to a future value of an explanatory variable X, based on a sample of previously observed independent data pairs (X
1
, Y
1
), ..., (X
n
, Y
n
) distributed like (X, Y), is very important in statistics. In the error-free case, where X is observed accurately, this problem is strongly related to that of standard regression estimation, since prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of the regression curve E(Y|X). When the observed X
i
s and the future observation of X are measured with error, prediction is of a quite different nature. Here, if T denotes the future (contaminated) available version of X, prediction of Y can be achieved via estimation of E(Y|T). In practice, estimating E(Y|T) can be quite challenging, as data may be collected under different conditions, making the measurement errors on X
i
and X nonidentically distributed. We take up this problem in the nonparametric setting and introduce estimators which allow a highly adaptive approach to smoothing. Reflecting the complexity of the problem, optimal rates of convergence of estimators can vary from the semiparametric n
−1/2
rate to much slower rates that are characteristic of nonparametric problems. Nevertheless, we are able to develop highly adaptive, data-driven methods that achieve very good performance in practice. This article has the supplementary materials online.
Acknowledgments: Carroll's research was supported by grants from the National Cancer
Institute (CA57030, CA104620).
Delaigle's work was partially supported by a fellowship from the Maurice
Belz foundation.
Hall's work was partially supported by the Australian Reserach Council and
by a grant from the National Science Foundation (DMS 0604698). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0162-1459 1537-274X |
DOI: | 10.1198/jasa.2009.tm07543 |