Plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 and vitronectin expression level and stoichiometry regulate vascular smooth muscle cell migration through physiological collagen matrices

Background:  Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration is a critical process in arterial remodeling. Purified plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) is reported to both promote and inhibit VSMC migration on two‐dimensional (D) surfaces. Objective:  To determine the effects of PAI‐1 and vitrone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 8; no. 8; pp. 1847 - 1854
Main Authors GARG, N., GOYAL, N., STRAWN, T. L., WU, J., MANN, K. M., LAWRENCE, D. A., FAY, W. P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2010
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration is a critical process in arterial remodeling. Purified plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) is reported to both promote and inhibit VSMC migration on two‐dimensional (D) surfaces. Objective:  To determine the effects of PAI‐1 and vitronectin (VN) expressed by VSMC themselves on migration through physiological collagen matrices. Methods:  We studied migration of wild‐type (WT), PAI‐1‐deficient, VN‐deficient, PAI‐1/VN doubly‐deficient (DKO) and PAI‐1‐transgenic (Tg) VSMC through three‐D collagen gels. Results:  WT VSMC migrated significantly slower than PAI‐1‐ and VN‐deficient VSMC, but significantly faster than DKO VSMC. Experiments with recombinant PAI‐1 suggested that basal VSMC PAI‐1 expression inhibits migration by binding VN, which is secreted by VSMC and binds collagen. However, PAI‐1‐over‐expressing Tg VSMC migrated faster than WT VSMC. Reconstitution experiments with recombinant PAI‐1 mutants suggested that the pro‐migratory effect of PAI‐1 over‐expression required its anti‐plasminogen activator (PA) and LDL receptor‐related protein (LRP) binding functions, but not VN binding. While promoting VSMC migration in the absence of PAI‐1, VN inhibited the pro‐migratory effect of active PAI‐1. Conclusions:  In isolation, VN and PAI‐1 are each pro‐migratory. However, via formation of a high‐affinity, non‐motogenic complex, PAI‐1 and VN each buffers the other’s pro‐migratory effect. The level of PAI‐1 expression by VSMC and the concentration of VN in extracellular matrix are critical determinants of whether PAI‐1 and VN promote or inhibit migration. These findings help to rectify previously conflicting reports and suggest that PAI‐1/VN stoichiometry plays an important role in VSMC migration and vascular remodeling.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03907.x