Accuracy of computed tomography to predict extracapsular spread in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma

To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective observational study. Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Laryngoscope Vol. 125; no. 7; p. 1613
Main Authors Maxwell, Jessica H, Rath, Tanya J, Byrd, James K, Albergotti, William G, Wang, Hong, Duvvuri, Umamaheswar, Kim, Seungwon, Johnson, Jonas T, Branstetter, 4th, Barton F, Ferris, Robert L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine the accuracy of pretreatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of extracapsular spread (ECS) in cervical lymph node metastases from p16-positive head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective observational study. Sixty-five (n = 65) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with p16-positive HNSCC and with cervical lymph node metastases measuring at least 1 centimeter in diameter on pathological assessment were included. All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Subjects' preoperative contrast-enhanced neck CT scans were independently assigned a score for the likelihood of ECS (5-point scale) by two board-certified neuroradiologists. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated, and optimal sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for each radiologist. On histological analysis, the majority of patients (58%; 38/65) were found to have ECS, and 29% (19/65) of patients had ≥ three metastatic lymph nodes. For radiologist 1, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 72% (95% confidence interval (CI), 53%-87%) and 53% (95% CI, 36%-70%), respectively. For radiologist 2, PPV and NPV for ECS detection were 82% (95% CI, 60 %-95%) and 53% (95% CI, 38%-69%), respectively. CT is not a reliable method for determining the presence of ECS in p16-positive HNSCC patients.
ISSN:1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.25140