A Comparative Study of Deep Neural Networks for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation during the Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors

Bladder cancer is a common and often fatal disease. Papillary bladder tumors are well detectable using cystoscopic imaging, but small or flat lesions are frequently overlooked by urologists. However, detection accuracy can be improved if the images from the cystoscope are segmented in real time by a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiagnostics (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 11; p. 2849
Main Authors Varnyú, Dóra, Szirmay-Kalos, László
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 01.11.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Bladder cancer is a common and often fatal disease. Papillary bladder tumors are well detectable using cystoscopic imaging, but small or flat lesions are frequently overlooked by urologists. However, detection accuracy can be improved if the images from the cystoscope are segmented in real time by a deep neural network (DNN). In this paper, we compare eight state-of-the-art DNNs for the semantic segmentation of white-light cystoscopy images: U-Net, UNet++, MA-Net, LinkNet, FPN, PAN, DeepLabv3, and DeepLabv3+. The evaluation includes per-image classification accuracy, per-pixel localization accuracy, prediction speed, and model size. Results show that the best F-score for bladder cancer (91%), the best segmentation map precision (92.91%), and the lowest size (7.93 MB) are also achieved by the PAN model, while the highest speed (6.73 ms) is obtained by DeepLabv3+. These results indicate better tumor localization accuracy than reported in previous studies. It can be concluded that deep neural networks may be extremely useful in the real-time diagnosis and therapy of bladder cancer, and among the eight investigated models, PAN shows the most promising results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics12112849