Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Center Experience and a Narrative Review of Recent Evidence

Radical cystectomy represents one of the most challenging surgical procedures, exhibiting a high morbidity rate. The transition to minimally invasive surgery in the field has been steep, due to either the technical complexity and prior concerns of atypical recurrences and/or peritoneal spread. More...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiagnostics (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 4; p. 714
Main Authors Rocco, Bernardo, Garelli, Giulia, Assumma, Simone, Turri, Filippo, Sangalli, Mattia, Calcagnile, Tommaso, Gaia, Giorgia, Terzoni, Stefano, Oliviero, Guglielmo, Stroppa, Daniele, Panio, Enrico, Sarchi, Luca, Del Nero, Alberto, Bozzini, Giorgio, Grasso, Angelica, Dell'Orto, Paolo, Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 01.02.2023
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Radical cystectomy represents one of the most challenging surgical procedures, exhibiting a high morbidity rate. The transition to minimally invasive surgery in the field has been steep, due to either the technical complexity and prior concerns of atypical recurrences and/or peritoneal spread. More recently, a larger series of RCTs has proven the oncological safety of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Beyond survival outcomes, the comparison between RARC and open surgery in terms of peri-operative morbidity is still ongoing. We present a single-center experience of RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Overall, 50% of patients had an intracorporeal neobladder reconstruction. The series confirms a low rate of complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ IIIa 7.5%) and wound infections (2.5%) and the absence of thromboembolic events. No atypical recurrences were found. To discuss these outcomes, we reviewed the literature related to RARC including level-1 evidence. PubMed and Web of Science searches were performed using the medical subject terms "robotic radical cystectomy" and "randomized controlled trial (RCT)". Six unique RCTs comparing robot and open surgery were found. Two clinical trials dealt with RARC with an intracorporeal reconstruction of UD. Pertinent clinical outcomes are summarized and discussed. In conclusion, RARC is a complex but feasible procedure. The transition from extracorporeal urinary diversion (UD) to a complete intracorporeal reconstruction could be the key to improving peri-operative outcomes and reducing the whole morbidity of the procedure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13040714