Clinical and ultrasound features of placental maturation in pre-gestational diabetic pregnancy
Pre-gestational diabetes (PGDM) is a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Delayed villous maturation (DVM) is a placental diagnosis with increased risk of perinatal mortality. This study aimed to prospectively look at the incidence of DVM in a PGDM population compared to non-diabet...
Saved in:
Published in | Early human development Vol. 88; no. 10; pp. 817 - 821 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01.10.2012
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Pre-gestational diabetes (PGDM) is a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Delayed villous maturation (DVM) is a placental diagnosis with increased risk of perinatal mortality.
This study aimed to prospectively look at the incidence of DVM in a PGDM population compared to non-diabetic controls. Additionally, we analysed antenatal ultrasound and clinical markers for DVM in the diabetic population.
This is a prospective study.
Placentae of women with non-diabetic and PGDM pregnancies underwent detailed blinded histo-pathological examination.
Clinical data, including birth weight, peri-natal outcome, and, in PGDM group, glycaemic control and ultrasound findings, were obtained.
77 non-diabetic women and 74 PGDM women consented to the study. The incidence of DVM in the PGDM group was higher than in the non-diabetic group (21/74 (28.4%) vs. 11/77 (14.3%) p=0.02; RR 1.98). In the PGDM group clinical and ultrasound markers were compared between the DVM group (n=21) and the non‐DVM group (n=53). There was no difference in perinatal outcome nor glycaemic control between these two groups.
DVM, a placental finding with an increased risk of perinatal mortality, is increased in PGDM population compared to non-diabetic controls. No association was found with maternal glycaemic control. The presence of placental DVM was not associated with antenatal ultrasound parameters nor clinical perinatal outcome. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0378-3782 1872-6232 1872-6232 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.06.001 |