Substratum‐dependent responses of ciliate assemblages to temperature: a natural experiment in Icelandic streams

Ciliate assemblages play a significant role in the microbial food web. The effects of environmental temperature on assemblage composition may be influenced by abiotic factors such as seasonality and disturbance, but the effects of temperature on ciliate assemblages found on different substrata have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFreshwater biology Vol. 60; no. 8; pp. 1561 - 1570
Main Authors Plebani, Marco, Fussmann, Katarina E, Hansen, Dennis M, O'Gorman, Eoin J, Stewart, Rebecca I. A, Woodward, Guy, Petchey, Owen L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications 01.08.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ciliate assemblages play a significant role in the microbial food web. The effects of environmental temperature on assemblage composition may be influenced by abiotic factors such as seasonality and disturbance, but the effects of temperature on ciliate assemblages found on different substrata have not been explored. Sandy bottoms and submerged rocks harbour dissimilar ciliate assemblages, and it might be expected that their ciliate assemblages will respond differently to temperature. We studied how alpha diversity, beta diversity and total biomass of ciliate protist assemblages found on sandy bottoms and submerged rocks differed in 13 geothermally heated streams in Iceland whose mean temperatures range from 5 to 20 °C. We recorded number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and measured the size of cells in ciliate assemblages from both substrata. Effects of temperature on natural ciliate assemblages were substratum dependent. On rock surfaces, both total ciliate biomass and alpha diversity declined with increasing temperature, and beta diversity increased with increasing temperature difference due to OTU nestedness (assemblages from warm streams being composed chiefly of subsets of the OTUs found in colder streams). In sandy substrata, however, ciliate assemblage composition was independent of temperature. Substratum‐specific responses may be due to differences in mechanical disturbance, nutrient availability or exposure to invertebrate grazers. Rock‐surface assemblages may be more exposed to the flow and retain less nutrient than those of sandy substratum; thus, they may be more strongly resource limited and more responsive to direct effects of temperature on metabolism. Alternatively, rock‐surface assemblages may be more exposed to grazing by invertebrates, which intensifies with temperature. Our study highlights the need to account for environmental context such as substratum type to fully understand the effect of temperature on microbial assemblages in streams. Future increases in global temperatures may affect fresh waters differently depending on their prevalent substratum. Those dominated by hard substrata may have their ciliate assemblages, and thus, food‐web structures and ecosystem functioning more strongly affected by warming relative to systems dominated by soft substrata.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12588
istex:180C68DC83D59CC590D7EA2A756BB1DC7DCA2E85
ArticleID:FWB12588
ark:/67375/WNG-9PPCKHLH-P
NERC - No. NE/L011840/1; No. NE/I009280/2
Table S1. Table showing the values for abiotic variables for each stream, ordered by mean stream temperature. Table S2. Results of the GLMMs assessing the correlation between temperature and alpha diversity (taxon richness) in ciliate assemblages found on submerged rock surfaces and sandy substrata. Table S3. Results of the LMMs assessing the correlation between temperature and the natural log of total ciliate biomass (originally in ng mL−1) found on submerged rock surfaces and sandy substrata. Figure S1. Location of Hengill in Iceland and map of the stream network. Stream 12, not shown, is located about 1.5 km southeast of Stream 15. Figure S2. Protist OTUs present in the samples from soft sediment collected at each temperature. Figure S3. Protist OTUs present in the samples from submerged rock surfaces collected at each temperature. Figure S4. Plots showing pairwise differences in beta diversity against pairwise temperature difference between streams (ΔT, in °C); data refer to ciliate assemblages found on submerged rock surfaces (panels a, c, e) and sandy substrata (panels b, d, f). The corresponding Pearson's r- and P-values are reported on top of each panel. Figure S5. Nonlinear Multi Dimensional Scaling (nMDS) ordinations based on the differences in ciliate beta diversity for submerged rock surfaces (a, c, e) and sandy substrata (b, d, f). The isoclines come from two-dimensional GAM models with nMDS ordinations as the response variable and mean stream temperatures as the explanatory variable.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-5070
1365-2427
DOI:10.1111/fwb.12588