In vivo semi-automatic segmentation of multicontrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance for prospective cohort studies on plaque tissue composition: initial experience

• Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 73 - 81
• Main Authors: Yoneyama, Taku, Sun, Jie, Hippe, Daniel S., Balu, Niranjan, Xu, Dongxiang, Kerwin, William S., Hatsukami, Thomas S., Yuan, Chun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Science and Business Media LLC 01.01.2016; Springer Netherlands; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Algorithms; Automation; Cardiac Imaging; Cardiology; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Arteries - pathology; Carotid Stenosis; Carotid Stenosis - pathology; Contrast Media; Contrast Media - administration & dosage; Disease Progression; Gadolinium DTPA; Gadolinium DTPA - administration & dosage; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods; Imaging; Longitudinal Studies; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Observer Variation; Original Paper; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Radiology; Reproducibility of Results; Time Factors; Multicontrast; Automatic segmentation; Carotid artery; Magnetic resonance imaging; Atherosclerosis
• ISSN: 1569-5794; 1875-8312; 1573-0743; 1875-8312
• DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0704-0

Automatic in vivo segmentation of multicontrast (multisequence) carotid magnetic resonance for plaque composition has been proposed as a substitute for manual review to save time and reduce inter-reader variability in large-scale or multicenter studies. Using serial images from a prospective longitudinal study, we sought to compare a semi-automatic approach versus expert human reading in analyzing carotid atherosclerosis progression. Baseline and 6-month follow-up multicontrast carotid images from 59 asymptomatic subjects with 16–79 % carotid stenosis were reviewed by both trained radiologists with 2–4 years of specialized experience in carotid plaque characterization with MRI and a previously reported automatic atherosclerotic plaque segmentation algorithm, referred to as morphology-enhanced probabilistic plaque segmentation (MEPPS). Agreement on measurements from individual time points, as well as on compositional changes, was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). There was good agreement between manual and MEPPS reviews on individual time points for calcification (CA) (area: ICC; 0.85–0.91; volume: ICC; 0.92–0.95) and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) (area: ICC; 0.78–0.82; volume: ICC; 0.84–0.86). For compositional changes, agreement was good for CA volume change (ICC; 0.78) and moderate for LRNC volume change (ICC; 0.49). Factors associated with LRNC progression as detected by MEPPS review included intraplaque hemorrhage (positive association) and reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (negative association), which were consistent with previous findings from manual review. Automatic classifier for plaque composition produced results similar to expert manual review in a prospective serial MRI study of carotid atherosclerosis progression. Such automatic classification tools may be beneficial in large-scale multicenter studies by reducing image analysis time and avoiding bias between human reviewers.