Lack of Clinically Meaningful Effect of Cariprazine on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive

Introduction Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug–drug int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurology and therapy Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 291 - 301
Main Authors Rosa, Márta Erzsébet, Juhász, Zoltán, Pásztor Mészáros, Gabriella, Magyar, Gabriella, Harsányi, Judit, Szatmári, Balázs, Hujber, Zoltán, Szabó, Máté, Kapás, Margit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cheshire Springer Healthcare 01.02.2025
Adis, Springer Healthcare
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Cariprazine (CAR) is a potent dopamine receptor partial agonist antipsychotic approved by the EMA and the FDA. To address the uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives during CAR co-administration and whether a second barrier method is necessary, a drug–drug interaction study with an oral contraceptive was conducted post-approval. Methods The phase I, fixed-sequence multicenter study involved two periods with 24 patients with schizophrenia, aiming to evaluate the effect of CAR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 μg levonorgestrel (LNG). In period A, a single dose of COC alone was administered on day 1. In period B, the highest therapeutic dose of 6 mg CAR was administered once daily from day 4, and a second dose of COC was given concomitantly on day 31. Results Overall, CAR had no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of the COC. The terminal half-life and the time of maximum plasma concentration of EE and LNG were not altered by CAR co-administration. The highest difference observed was a decrease of 14% in the maximum plasma concentration of EE, with only slight deviation of the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the test/reference ratio (77.09–96.81) from the generally accepted bioequivalence range of 80–125%, which is not considered clinically relevant. Confidence intervals of all other exposure measures were within the 80–125% range for both EE and LNG. Conclusions According to these results, hormonal contraceptives can be considered effective during CAR treatment. Trial Registration Trial registration number (EudraCT) 2018-003722-80.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2193-8253
2193-6536
DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00686-7