Job insecurity and employee health: The buffering potential of job control and job self-efficacy

This study examines the direct and moderating effects of two types of control that employees have over the work situation - job control and job self-efficacy - on the relationship between job insecurity and employee health. The authors hypothesize that job control and job self-efficacy attenuate the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWork and stress Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 56 - 72
Main Authors Schreurs, Bert, van Emmerik, Hetty, Notelaers, Guy, De Witte, Hans
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2010
Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examines the direct and moderating effects of two types of control that employees have over the work situation - job control and job self-efficacy - on the relationship between job insecurity and employee health. The authors hypothesize that job control and job self-efficacy attenuate the negative effects of job insecurity on both a short-term (i.e. need for recovery) and a long-term health outcome (i.e. impaired general health). These hypotheses were examined using survey data collected from a heterogeneous sample of 1368 Belgian workers. Results of moderated regression analysis showed that job control, but not job self-efficacy, buffered the negative effects of job insecurity on employee health. We conclude that organizations can temper the negative health effects of job insecurity by giving their employees more control over their work.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0267-8373
1464-5335
DOI:10.1080/02678371003718733