Job insecurity and employee health: The buffering potential of job control and job self-efficacy
This study examines the direct and moderating effects of two types of control that employees have over the work situation - job control and job self-efficacy - on the relationship between job insecurity and employee health. The authors hypothesize that job control and job self-efficacy attenuate the...
Saved in:
Published in | Work and stress Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 56 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Taylor & Francis Group
01.01.2010
Taylor & Francis Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study examines the direct and moderating effects of two types of control that employees have over the work situation - job control and job self-efficacy - on the relationship between job insecurity and employee health. The authors hypothesize that job control and job self-efficacy attenuate the negative effects of job insecurity on both a short-term (i.e. need for recovery) and a long-term health outcome (i.e. impaired general health). These hypotheses were examined using survey data collected from a heterogeneous sample of 1368 Belgian workers. Results of moderated regression analysis showed that job control, but not job self-efficacy, buffered the negative effects of job insecurity on employee health. We conclude that organizations can temper the negative health effects of job insecurity by giving their employees more control over their work. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0267-8373 1464-5335 |
DOI: | 10.1080/02678371003718733 |