Comparative fixation devices for preventing migration of the proximal tibiofibular joint during tibial lengthening: a tether versus screw fixation

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 298
• Main Authors: Wongcharoenwatana, Jidapa, Hoellwarth, Jason S, Greenstein, Michael D, Reif, Taylor J, Fragomen, Austin T, Rozbruch, S Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 15.07.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Ankle; Bone implants; Bone Screws; Comparative analysis; Distraction osteogenesis; Etiology; Female; Fibula; Fibula - surgery; Fixation; Humans; Internal lengthening nail; Knee; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - surgery; Limbs; Magnetic nail; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Migration; Orthopedics; Pain; Patients; Proximal tibiofibular joint; Retrospective Studies; Statistical analysis; Tibia; Tibia - diagnostic imaging; Tibia - surgery; Tibial lengthening; Young Adult; Fibular migration; Tibial lengthening; Fixation; Internal lengthening nail; Magnetic nail; Distraction osteogenesis; Proximal tibiofibular joint
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03771-z

When lengthening the tibia segment using motorized internal lengthening nails (MILN), undesired distal migration of the proximal fibula segment is prevented by tibiofibular stabilization, traditionally using a screw. A tightened cortical suspensory fixation rope (tether) is an alternative option, but its appropriateness has never been studied. The primary outcome was comparing the amount of proximal fibular migration between patients who were stabilized with either a tether or a screw. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the effect of fibular migration on the clinical outcome between both groups. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent tibial lengthening with MILN between April 2016 and June 2022. Two cohorts were compared: 18 limbs with tether fixation versus 29 limbs with screw fixation. Data on the patient's age, sex, etiologies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Radiographic measurements included the lengthening distance and the amount of proximal fibular migration. In total, 47 limbs from 41 patients, with average age 35.01 ± 13.72 years old. There were 28 males (68.29%) and 13 females (31.71%). The tether group demonstrated a statistically significant greater distance of migration than the screw group (p < 0.001), with an average migration distance of 8.39 ± 5.09 mm and 2.59 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. No correlation was found between the amount of tibial lengthening and the distance of proximal fibular migration in both the tether group (p = 0.96) and the screw group (p = 0.32). There was no significant difference in the change of knee extension between both groups (p = 0.3), and no patients reported knee pain or tightness. A screw provides better resistance to proximal tibiofibular joint migration during MILN lengthening, but the difference appears clinically inconsequential. Either option appears suitable.