SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: comparison between the first and second pandemic waves

In Italy, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection peaked in April and November 2020, defining two pandemic waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and SARS-CoV-2 infections between pandemic wav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC gastroenterology Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 230
Main Authors Bezzio, Cristina, Vernero, Marta, Costa, Stefania, Armuzzi, Alessandro, Fiorino, Gionata, Ardizzone, Sandro, Roselli, Jenny, Carparelli, Sonia, Orlando, Ambrogio, Caprioli, Flavio Andrea, Castiglione, Fabiana, Viganò, Chiara, Ribaldone, Davide G, Zingone, Fabiana, Monterubbianesi, Rita, Imperatore, Nicola, Festa, Stefano, Daperno, Marco, Scucchi, Ludovica, Ferronato, Antonio, Pastorelli, Luca, Alimenti, Eleonora, Balestrieri, Paola, Ricci, Chiara, Cappello, Maria, Felice, Carla, Coppini, Francesca, Alvisi, Patrizia, Di Luna, Imma, Gerardi, Viviana, Variola, Angela, Mazzuoli, Silvia, Lenti, Marco Vincenzo, Saibeni, Simone
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 05.07.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Italy, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection peaked in April and November 2020, defining two pandemic waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and SARS-CoV-2 infections between pandemic waves. Observational longitudinal study of IBD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with established diagnoses of IBD and of SARS-CoV-2 infection were consecutively enrolled in two periods: (i) first wave, from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2020; and (ii) second wave, from 15 September to 15 December 2020. We enrolled 937 IBD patients (219 in the first wave, 718 in the second wave). Patients of the first wave were older (mean ± SD: 46.3 ± 16.2 vs. 44.1 ± 15.4 years, p = 0.06), more likely to have ulcerative colitis (58.0% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001) and comorbidities (48.9% vs. 38.9%; p < 0.01), and more frequently residing in Northern Italy (73.1% vs. 46.0%, p < 0.001) than patients of the second wave. There were no significant differences between pandemic waves in sex (male: 54.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.82) or frequency of active IBD (44.3% vs. 39.0%, p = 0.18). The rates of negative outcomes were significantly higher in the first than second wave: pneumonia (27.8% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001), hospital admission (27.4% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), ventilatory support (11.9% vs. 5.4%, p < 0.003) and death (5.5% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.007). Between the first and second SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves, demographic, clinical and geographical features of IBD patients were different as were the symptoms and outcomes of infection. These differences are likely due to the different epidemiological situations and diagnostic possibilities between the two waves.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1471-230X
1471-230X
DOI:10.1186/s12876-023-02841-0