A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Group Reflective Practice in Medical Students

• Published in: Healthcare (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 12; p. 1798
• Main Authors: Leung, Kelvin C Y, Peisah, Carmelle
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.06.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Analysis; Clinical competence; Communication; continuing medical education; Curricula; Database searching; Educational research; Empathy; Experiential learning; Group medical practice; Humanitarianism; Internet/Web search services; Medical colleges; Medical education; Medical research; Medical students; Medicine; Medicine, Experimental; Mixed methods research; Online searching; Pedagogy; Professional development; Professional workers; professionalism; Psychological aspects; Qualitative research; Reflective practice; Reflective teaching; Skills; Systematic Review; wellbeing; Australia; United Kingdom; empathy; professionalism; reflective practice; continuing medical education; wellbeing
• ISSN: 2227-9032; 2227-9032
• DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121798

Used primarily as a pedagogical evaluation tool for didactic teaching and skill development, reflective practice (RP) for its own merits is poorly understood. This study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the role of group RP in fostering empathy, wellbeing, and professionalism in medical students. Electronic searches of empirical studies published between 1 January 2010 and 22 March 2022 from Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO databases were conducted. Empirical studies of any design (qualitative or quantitative) which included RP (1) involving medical students; (2) with a focus on fostering empathy, or professionalism, or personal wellbeing; and (3) provided in a group setting were included. Duplicates, non-English articles, grey literature and articles using RP to examine pedagogy and specific technical skills were excluded. Both authors screened articles independently to derive a final list of included studies, with any discrepancies resolved by discussion, until consensus reached. Articles were rated for methodological quality using the Attree and Milton checklist for qualitative studies; the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria, and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for quantitative studies. Of 314 articles identified, 18 were included: 9 qualitative; 4 quantitative and 5 mixed methodology. Settings included United States (6), United Kingdom (3), Australia (3), France (2), Taiwan (2), Germany (1), and Ireland (1). Themes were (i) professionalism: bridging theoretical paradigms and practice; (ii) halting empathy decline; (iii) wellbeing: shared experience. Additional themes regarding the "successful" delivery of RP groups in facilitating these outcomes also emerged. This first systematic review of group RP in medical students shows that RP may bring theory to life in clinical dilemmas, while fostering collegiality and mitigating against isolation amongst students, despite the absence of studies directly examining wellbeing. These findings support the value of RP integration focusing on emotive and humanitarian processes into contemporary medical education for medical students. PROSPERO CRD42022322496.