Identifying priorities in knowledge translation from the perspective of trainees: results from an online survey

• Published in: Implementation science : IS Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 92
• Main Authors: Newman, Kristine, Van Eerd, Dwayne, Powell, Byron J, Urquhart, Robin, Cornelissen, Evelyn, Chan, Vivian, Lal, Shalini
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 21.06.2015; BioMed Central
• Subjects: Collaboration; Cooperative Behavior; Corporate culture; Humans; Information Systems - organization & administration; Knowledge; Mental health; Models, Theoretical; Native peoples; Organizational change; Public health; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Researchers; Residence Characteristics; Short Report; Social Media; Social networks; Stakeholders; Surveys; Sustainable development; Systematic review; Theory; Translational Medical Research - organization & administration
• ISSN: 1748-5908; 1748-5908
• DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0282-5

The need to identify priorities to help shape future directions for research and practice increases as the knowledge translation (KT) field advances. Since many KT trainees are developing their research programs, understanding their concerns and KT research and practice priorities is important to supporting the development and advancement of KT as a field. Our purpose was to identify research and practice priorities in the KT field from the perspectives of KT researcher/practitioner trainees. Survey response rate was 62 % (44/71). Participants were mostly Canadian graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, residents, and learners from various disciplines; the majority was from Ontario (44 %) and Quebec (20 %). Seven percent (5/71) were from other countries including USA, UK, and Switzerland. Seven main KT priority themes were identified: determining the effectiveness of KT strategies, technology use, increased key stakeholder involvement, context, theory, expand ways of inquiry, and sustainability. Overall, the priorities identified by the trainees correspond with KT literature and with KT experts' views. The trainees appeared to push the boundaries of current KT literature with respect to creative use of communication technologies research.