Promoting endoscopists' health through cutting‐edge motion analysis technology: Accuracy and precision of ergonomic motion tracking system for endoscopy suite (EMTES)

• Published in: Journal of occupational health Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. e12355 - n/a
• Main Authors: Ono, Hiroaki, Hori, Yasuki, Tsunemi, Mafu, Matsuzaki, Ippei, Hayashi, Kazuki, Kamijima, Michihiro, Ebara, Takeshi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2022; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Accuracy; endoscopist; Endoscopy; Ergonomics; Field Study; Fingers & toes; Humans; Male; Medical equipment; Model accuracy; Motion; motion tracking; Movement; Musculoskeletal diseases; musculoskeletal disorders; Occlusion; Occupational health; Orientation; Posture; precision; Regression coefficients; Sensors; Technology assessment; Tracking systems; endoscopist; accuracy; musculoskeletal disorders; motion tracking; occlusion; precision
• ISSN: 1348-9585; 1341-9145; 1348-9585
• DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12355

Objectives Endoscopists often suffer from musculoskeletal disorders due to posture‐specific workloads imposed by precise maneuvering or long procedural duration. An ergonomic motion tracking system for endoscopy suite (EMTES) was developed using Azure Kinect sensors to evaluate the occlusion, accuracy, and precision, focusing mainly on upper and lower limb movements. Methods Three healthy male participants pointed the prescribed points for 5 s on the designated work envelopes and their coordinates were measured. The mean occlusion rate (%) of the 32 motion tracking landmarks, standard deviation (SD) of distance and orientation, and partial regression coefficient (β) and R2 model fit for accuracy were calculated using the time series of coordinates data of the upper/lower limb movements. Results The mean occlusion rate was 5.2 ± 10.6% and 1.6 ± 1.4% for upper and lower limb movements, respectively. Of the 32 landmarks, 28 (87.5%) had occlusion rates of 10% or less. The mean SDs of 4.2 mm for distance and 1.2° for orientation were found. Most of the R2 values were over 0.9. In the case of right upper/lower limb measurement for orientation, β coefficients ranged from 0.82 to 1.36. Conclusion EMTES is reliable in calculating occlusion, precision, and accuracy for practical motion‐tracking measurements in endoscopists.