Head kinematics in patients with neck pain compared to asymptomatic controls: a systematic review

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 156
• Main Authors: Franov, Esther, Straub, Matthias, Bauer, Christoph M, Ernst, Markus J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 16.02.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Asymptomatic; Biomechanical Phenomena; Diagnosis; Exercise; Head; Head movements; Health aspects; Humans; Joints; Kinematics; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Movement; Movement tasks; Musculoskeletal diseases; Neck; Neck pain; Neck Pain - diagnosis; Pain; Patients; Physiological aspects; Range of motion; Reaction time task; Sensorimotor system; Systematic review; Velocity; Whiplash; Switzerland; United States > US; Biomechanical phenomena; Neck pain; Whiplash; Movement tasks; Head movements
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05097-z

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders encountered by healthcare providers. A precise assessment of functional deficits, including sensorimotor control impairment, is regarded necessary for tailored exercise programmes. Sensorimotor control can be measured by kinematic characteristics, such as velocity, acceleration, smoothness, and temporal measures, or by assessing movement accuracy. This systematic review aims to identify movement tasks and distinct outcome variables used to measure kinematics and movement accuracy in patients with neck pain and present their results in comparison to asymptomatic controls. Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PEDro, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases from inception to August 2020. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed. Movement tasks and specific outcome parameters used were collated. The level of evidence for potential group differences in each outcome variable between patients with neck pain and controls was evaluated. Twenty-seven studies examining head kinematics and movement accuracy during head-aiming, functional and unconstrained movement tasks of the head were included. Average Risk of Bias of included studies was moderate. In total, 23 different outcome variables were assessed. A strong level of evidence for an increased movement time and for an increased number of errors during head aiming tasks was found. Moderate evidence was found in traumatic neck pain for a decreased mean velocity, peak acceleration, and reaction time, and for point deviation and time on target during head aiming tasks. Moderate evidence was found for decreased acceleration during unconstrained movements, too. Results on the remaining movement task and outcome variables showed only limited, very limited or even conflicting level of evidence for patients with neck pain to differ from controls. Sensorimotor control in NP in the way of kinematic and movement accuracy characteristics of head motion was examined in head aiming, functional or unconstrained movement tasks. The results from this review indicate that for some characteristics that describe sensorimotor control, patients with NP differ from healthy controls. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020139083.