Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 445 - 13
• Main Authors: Fu, Chun-Wei, Chen, Wei-Cheng, Lu, Yung-Chang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 07.07.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: ACL reconstruction; All-inside; Analysis; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - diagnostic imaging; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Autografts; Bone implants; Clinical trials; Drilling; Femur - surgery; Humans; Interference screws; Knee; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - surgery; Ligaments; Medical research; Meta-analysis; Methods; Musculoskeletal diseases; Orthopedic surgery; Patients; Quality; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Studies; Surgery; Suspensory fixation; Systematic review; Tibia; Tibia - diagnostic imaging; Tibia - surgery; ACL reconstruction; Interference screws; Suspensory fixation; All-inside; Anterior cruciate ligament
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03471-3

To compare the clinical results of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel drilling. Systematic searches were conducted of published literature up to November 2019 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing all-inside ACLR using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel ACLR. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted the outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias of the eligible studies. The clinical outcome and graft reruptures were pooled by using random effects with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. A total of nine studies (five randomized controlled trials and four comparative studies) involving 613 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The postoperative functional outcome, knee laxity measured with arthrometer, and graft reruptures were comparable between patients with all-inside ACLR using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel ACLR. However, a significantly greater thickness of autologous tendon was used and less change in drilling tunnel diameter was noted in patients with suspensory cortical button graft fixation. All-inside ACLR with suspensory cortical button fixation was not clinically superior to full tibial tunnel ACLR with interference screw fixation in functional outcomes, knee laxity measured with arthrometer, or rerupture rate. However, the advantage of using suspensory cortical button fixation was that a thicker graft could be used for reconstruction, and brought less tibia tunnel widening compared with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.