Untested assumptions: psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making
Trauma survivors often have to negotiate legal systems such as refugee status determination or the criminal justice system. We outline and discuss the contribution which research on trauma and related psychological processes can make to two particular areas of law where complex and difficult legal d...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of psychotraumatology Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 27380 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Taylor & Francis
19.05.2015
Taylor & Francis Ltd Co-Action Publishing Taylor & Francis Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Trauma survivors often have to negotiate legal systems such as refugee status determination or the criminal justice system.
We outline and discuss the contribution which research on trauma and related psychological processes can make to two particular areas of law where complex and difficult legal decisions must be made: in claims for refugee and humanitarian protection, and in reporting and prosecuting sexual assault in the criminal justice system.
There is a breadth of psychological knowledge that, if correctly applied, would limit the inappropriate reliance on assumptions and myth in legal decision-making in these settings. Specific recommendations are made for further study. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This paper is part of the Special Issue: Trauma and PTSD: setting the research agenda. More papers from this issue can be found at www.ejpt.net |
ISSN: | 2000-8066 2000-8198 2000-8066 |
DOI: | 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27380 |