Dialyzer surface area is a significant predictor of mortality in patients on hemodialysis: a 3-year nationwide cohort study

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 20616
• Main Authors: Abe, Masanori, Masakane, Ikuto, Wada, Atsushi, Nakai, Shigeru, Nitta, Kosaku, Nakamoto, Hidetomo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 18.10.2021; Nature Publishing Group UK; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: Aged; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Dialysis; Dialyzers; Female; Hemodialysis; Humans; Japan - epidemiology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy; Kidneys, Artificial - adverse effects; Male; Membranes, Artificial; Middle Aged; Mortality; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Dialysis - adverse effects; Renal Dialysis - mortality; Sensitivity analysis; Surface area; Japan
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99834-4

A target Kt/V of > 1.4 and use of a high-flux dialyzer are recommended for patients on hemodialysis. However, there is little information on the relationship between the dialyzer surface area and mortality in these patients. In this nationwide cohort study, we aimed to clarify this relationship by analyzing data from the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy for 2010-2013. We enrolled 234,638 patients on hemodialysis who were divided according to quartile for dialyzer surface area into the S group (small, < 1.5 m ), M group (medium, 1.5 m ), L group (large, 1.6 to < 2.0 m ), or XL group (extra-large, ≥ 2.0 m ). We assessed the association of each group with 3-year mortality using Cox proportional hazards models and performed propensity score matching analysis. By the end of 2013, a total of 53,836 patients on dialysis (22.9%) had died. There was a significant decrease in mortality with larger dialyzer surface areas. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was significantly higher in the S group (1.15 [1.12-1.19], P < 0.0001) and significantly lower in the L group (0.89 [0.87-0.92] P < 0.0001) and XL group (0.75 [0.72-0.78], P < 0.0001) than in the M group as a reference after adjustment for all confounders. Findings were robust in several sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the findings remained significant after propensity score matching. Hemodialysis using dialyzers, especially super high-flux dialyzers with a larger surface area might reduce mortality rates, and a surface area of ≥ 2.0 m is superior, even with the same Kt/V.