S1 gene-based phylogeny of infectious bronchitis virus: An attempt to harmonize virus classification

• Published in: Infection, genetics and evolution Vol. 39; pp. 349 - 364
• Main Authors: Valastro, Viviana, Holmes, Edward C., Britton, Paul, Fusaro, Alice, Jackwood, Mark W., Cattoli, Giovanni, Monne, Isabella
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.04.2016
• Subjects: amino acid sequences; Animals; Chickens; Classification; Computational Biology - methods; Coronavirus Infections - virology; epidemiology; Evolution; financial economics; genes; Genotype; genotyping; IBV; Infectious bronchitis virus; Infectious bronchitis virus - classification; Infectious bronchitis virus - genetics; nucleotide sequences; Phylogeny; poultry industry; Recombination, Genetic; sequence analysis; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Viral Envelope Proteins - genetics; viruses; Evolution; Phylogeny; IBV; Classification
• ISSN: 1567-1348; 1567-7257; 1567-7257
• DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.015

Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is the causative agent of a highly contagious disease that results in severe economic losses to the global poultry industry. The virus exists in a wide variety of genetically distinct viral types, and both phylogenetic analysis and measures of pairwise similarity among nucleotide or amino acid sequences have been used to classify IBV strains. However, there is currently no consensus on the method by which IBV sequences should be compared, and heterogeneous genetic group designations that are inconsistent with phylogenetic history have been adopted, leading to the confusing coexistence of multiple genotyping schemes. Herein, we propose a simple and repeatable phylogeny-based classification system combined with an unambiguous and rationale lineage nomenclature for the assignment of IBV strains. By using complete nucleotide sequences of the S1 gene we determined the phylogenetic structure of IBV, which in turn allowed us to define 6 genotypes that together comprise 32 distinct viral lineages and a number of inter-lineage recombinants. Because of extensive rate variation among IBVs, we suggest that the inference of phylogenetic relationships alone represents a more appropriate criterion for sequence classification than pairwise sequence comparisons. The adoption of an internationally accepted viral nomenclature is crucial for future studies of IBV epidemiology and evolution, and the classification scheme presented here can be updated and revised novel S1 sequences should become available. •There is no consensus on the method by which IBV sequences should be compared.•A phylogeny-based classification system for the assignment of IBV strains is proposed.•Adoption of a common nomenclature is crucial for the study of IBV evolution.