Analysis of biofilm bacterial communities under different shear stresses using size-fractionated sediment

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 1299 - 14
• Main Authors: Fang, Hongwei, Chen, Yishan, Huang, Lei, He, Guojian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Nature Publishing Group 02.05.2017; Nature Publishing Group UK; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: Aerobic bacteria; Anaerobic bacteria; Anaerobic microorganisms; Aquatic ecosystems; Bacteria; Bacteroidetes - genetics; Biodiversity; Biofilms; Ecosystem; Geologic Sediments - microbiology; Lakes - microbiology; Mechanical stimuli; Opportunist infection; Proteobacteria - genetics; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics; rRNA 16S; Sediments; Stress, Mechanical; Water flow
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01446-4

Microorganisms are ubiquitous in aqueous environments and are crucial for biogeochemical processes, but their community structures and functions remain poorly understood. In this paper, a rotating reactor was designed to study the effects of substrata and flow conditions on sediment bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, assaying three groups of size-fractionated sediments and three different levels of applied shear stress. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla of the microbial communities, with more anaerobic bacteria and opportunistic pathogens being detected under static water conditions, while more aerobic bacteria were detected under dynamic water flow conditions. Most of the top 10 genera were present in all the samples; however, there were significant differences in the species abundance. Paludibacter and Comamonadaceae_unclassified were the most abundant genera under static and dynamic conditions, respectively. Under static water conditions, the medium-grained sediment had the highest microbial diversity, followed by the fine and coarse sediments. Under dynamic water flow conditions, a higher flow velocity corresponded to a greater microbial diversity. Overall, there was no significant difference in the community richness or diversity between the static and dynamic water flow conditions. This study is beneficial for further understanding the heterogeneities of microbial communities in natural aquatic ecosystems.