Experimental study of airflow characteristics of stratum ventilation in a multi-occupant room with comparison to mixing ventilation and displacement ventilation

The motivation of this study is stimulated by a lack of knowledge about the difference of airflow characteristics between a novel air distribution method [i.e., stratum ventilation (SV)] and conventional air distribution methods [i.e., mixing ventilation (MV) and displacement ventilation (DV)]. Deta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndoor air Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 662 - 671
Main Authors Cheng, Y., Lin, Z.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The motivation of this study is stimulated by a lack of knowledge about the difference of airflow characteristics between a novel air distribution method [i.e., stratum ventilation (SV)] and conventional air distribution methods [i.e., mixing ventilation (MV) and displacement ventilation (DV)]. Detailed air velocity and temperature measurements were conducted in the occupied zone of a classroom with dimensions of 8.8 m (L) × 6.1 m (W) × 2.4 m (H). Turbulence intensity and power spectrum of velocity fluctuation were calculated using the measured data. Thermal comfort and cooling efficiency were also compared. The results show that in the occupied zone, the airflow characteristics among MV, DV, and SV are different. The turbulent airflow fluctuation is enhanced in this classroom with multiple thermal manikins due to thermal buoyancy and airflow mixing effect. Thermal comfort evaluations indicate that in comparison with MV and DV, a higher supply air temperature should be adopted for SV to achieve general thermal comfort with low draft risk. Comparison of the mean air temperatures in the occupied zone reveals that SV is of highest cooling efficiency, followed by DV and then MV.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-3PPWJQZ1-5
Figure S1. Infrared photo of thermal manikins (°C). Figure S2. Distribution of mean air velocity for the other sampling lines in the occupied zone under 10 ACH. Figure S3. Visualization of stratum-ventilated flow pattern under 10 ACH, (a) supply temperature = 18°C; (b) supply temperature = 21°C. Figure S4. Distribution of mean air temperature for the other sampling lines in the occupied zone under 10 ACH.
General Research Grant
ArticleID:INA12188
National Natural Science Foundation of China - No. 51178407
istex:313CECD72E9E7BE0B747A9307CAB574D4C616DF5
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0905-6947
1600-0668
DOI:10.1111/ina.12188