What does Life-Cycle Assessment of agricultural products need for more meaningful inclusion of biodiversity?

1. Decision-makers increasingly use life-cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products. LCA is of particular importance in globalized agricultural supply chains, which have environmental effects in multiple and spatially dispersed locations. 2. Incorporatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of applied ecology Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 1422 - 1429
Main Authors Teillard, Félix, de Souza, Danielle Maia, Thoma, Greg, Gerber, Pierre J., Finn, John A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford John Wiley & Sons Ltd 01.10.2016
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:1. Decision-makers increasingly use life-cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products. LCA is of particular importance in globalized agricultural supply chains, which have environmental effects in multiple and spatially dispersed locations. 2. Incorporation of impacts on biodiversity that arise from agricultural production systems into environmental assessment methods is an emerging area of work in LCA, and current approaches have limitations, including the need for (i) improved assessment of impacts to biodiversity associated with agricultural production, (ii) inclusion of new biodiversity indicators (e.g. conservation value, functional diversity, ecosystem services) and (iii) inclusion of previously unaccounted modelling variables that go beyond land-use impacts (e.g. climate change, water and soil quality). 3. Synthesis and applications. Ecological models and understanding can contribute to address the limitations of current life-cycle assessment (LCA) methods in agricultural production systems and to make them more ecologically relevant. This will be necessary to ensure that biodiversity is not neglected in decision-making that relies on LCA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-8901
1365-2664
1365-2664
DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.12683