Security, development and the Australian security discourse about failed states
This paper discusses Mark Duffield's theory of the merging of development and security. It introduces failed states as a key linkage between these concepts. To subject the theory to a partial empirical test, the use of the term 'failed state' in Australian security discourse vis-à-vis...
Saved in:
Published in | Australian journal of political science Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 407 - 418 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Routledge
01.09.2006
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper discusses Mark Duffield's theory of the merging of development and security. It introduces failed states as a key linkage between these concepts. To subject the theory to a partial empirical test, the use of the term 'failed state' in Australian security discourse vis-à-vis three countries in the South Pacific is presented. Evidence from these cases supports the notion that security and development are indeed coming together. This threatens to strip development policy of its meaning, subordinating it to security concerns. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 2008-01-21T19:31:10+11:00 AJPS.jpg Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, September 2006: 407-418 Australian Journal of Political Science, v.41, no.3, Sept 2006: (407)-418 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 1036-1146 1363-030X |
DOI: | 10.1080/10361140600848994 |