Security, development and the Australian security discourse about failed states

This paper discusses Mark Duffield's theory of the merging of development and security. It introduces failed states as a key linkage between these concepts. To subject the theory to a partial empirical test, the use of the term 'failed state' in Australian security discourse vis-à-vis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAustralian journal of political science Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 407 - 418
Main Author Lambach, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 01.09.2006
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper discusses Mark Duffield's theory of the merging of development and security. It introduces failed states as a key linkage between these concepts. To subject the theory to a partial empirical test, the use of the term 'failed state' in Australian security discourse vis-à-vis three countries in the South Pacific is presented. Evidence from these cases supports the notion that security and development are indeed coming together. This threatens to strip development policy of its meaning, subordinating it to security concerns.
Bibliography:2008-01-21T19:31:10+11:00
AJPS.jpg
Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, September 2006: 407-418
Australian Journal of Political Science, v.41, no.3, Sept 2006: (407)-418
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1036-1146
1363-030X
DOI:10.1080/10361140600848994