Speech-in-noise perception in high-functioning individuals with autism or Asperger's syndrome

Background:  High‐functioning individuals with autism (HFA) or Asperger's syndrome (AS) commonly report difficulties understanding speech in situations where there is background speech or noise. The objective of this study was threefold: (1) to verify the validity of these reports; (2) to quant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of child psychology and psychiatry Vol. 45; no. 6; pp. 1107 - 1114
Main Authors Alcántara, José I., Weisblatt, Emma J.L., Moore, Brian C.J., Bolton, Patrick F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing 01.09.2004
Wiley-Blackwell
Blackwell
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-9630
1469-7610
DOI10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00303.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  High‐functioning individuals with autism (HFA) or Asperger's syndrome (AS) commonly report difficulties understanding speech in situations where there is background speech or noise. The objective of this study was threefold: (1) to verify the validity of these reports; (2) to quantify the difficulties experienced; and (3) to propose possible mechanisms to explain the perceptual deficits described. Method:  Speech‐in‐noise perception abilities were measured using speech reception thresholds (SRTs), defined as the speech‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) at which approximately 50% of the speech is correctly identified. SRTs were measured for 11 individuals with HFA/AS and 9 age/IQ‐matched normal‐hearing control subjects, using an adaptive procedure, in a non‐reverberant sound‐attenuating chamber. The speech materials were standardised lists of everyday sentences spoken by a British male speaker. The background sounds were: (1) a single female talker; (2) a steady speech‐shaped noise; (3) a speech‐shaped noise with temporal dips; (4) a steady speech‐shaped noise with regularly spaced spectral dips; and (5) a speech‐shaped noise with temporal and spectral dips. Results:  SRTs for the HFA/AS group were generally higher (worse) than those for the controls, across the five background sounds. A statistically significant difference in SRTs between the subject groups was found only for those background sounds that contained temporal or spectro‐temporal dips. SRTs for the HFA/AS individuals were 2 to 3.5 dB higher than for the controls, equivalent to a substantial decrease in speech recognition. Expressed another way, the HFA/AS individuals required a higher SNR, whenever there were temporal dips in the background sound, to perform at the same level as the controls. Conclusions:  The results suggest that the speech‐in‐noise perception difficulties experienced by individuals with autism may be due, in part, to a reduced ability to integrate information from glimpses present in the temporal dips in the noise.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-7524Z243-Q
ArticleID:JCPP303
istex:D286382386210A857F7343859994DC0ADC569DA5
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9630
1469-7610
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00303.x