How to Overcome Pro-Change Bias: Incorporating Passive and Active Innovation Resistance in Innovation Decision Models

Adoption literature is largely subject to a pro‐change bias; researchers mainly assume that consumers are open to change and thus interested in evaluating new products. However, consumers often reject innovations without considering their potential, such that the adoption process ends before it real...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of product innovation management Vol. 31; no. 5; pp. 894 - 907
Main Authors Talke, Katrin, Heidenreich, Sven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2014
Blackwell Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0737-6782
1540-5885
DOI10.1111/jpim.12130

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Adoption literature is largely subject to a pro‐change bias; researchers mainly assume that consumers are open to change and thus interested in evaluating new products. However, consumers often reject innovations without considering their potential, such that the adoption process ends before it really has begun. The present study instead argues that innovation resistance, prior to product evaluation, is a regular consumer response that must be recognized and managed to facilitate new product adoption. The authors suggest differentiating passive from active innovation resistance. While passive innovation resistance results from a consumer's generic predisposition to resist innovations prior to new product evaluation, active innovation resistance is an attitudinal outcome that follows an unfavorable new product evaluation. This study also extends extant innovation decision models by describing how passive and active innovation resistance emerge and how they affect decision‐making in later stages of the process.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JPIM12130
istex:CDA959D93CD86ADFD6CB7F4D5A256E4756A47537
ark:/67375/WNG-WJC6XVT1-P
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0737-6782
1540-5885
DOI:10.1111/jpim.12130