Humoral immune response to repeated lumpy skin disease virus vaccination and performance of serological tests

• Published in: BMC veterinary research Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 80
• Main Authors: Milovanović, Milovan, Dietze, Klaas, Milićević, Vesna, Radojičić, Sonja, Valčić, Miroslav, Moritz, Tom, Hoffmann, Bernd
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 06.03.2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Animal vaccination; Animals; Animals, Newborn - immunology; Antibodies; Antibodies, Viral; Antigens; Beef cattle; Bovidae; Calves; Cattle; Cattle diseases; Cattle industry; Disease; ELISA; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary; Extracellular fluids; Farms; Female; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect - veterinary; Health aspects; Humoral immunity; Immune response; Immune response (humoral); Immunity, Humoral; Immunity, Maternally-Acquired; Immunoglobulins; Infectious skin diseases; Investigations; LSD; LSDV; Lumpy skin disease; Lumpy Skin Disease - immunology; Lumpy Skin Disease - prevention & control; Lumpy skin disease virus - immunology; Neutralization Tests - veterinary; Newborn infants; Outbreaks; Passive antibody transfer; Prevention; Secondary response; Sensitivity and Specificity; Serbia; Serologic Tests - veterinary; Serological tests; Sheep; Skin; Skin diseases; Statistical analysis; Vaccination; Vaccination - veterinary; Vaccines; Vaccines, Attenuated - administration & dosage; Viruses; Serbia; Turkey; Iran; Republic of Macedonia; LSDV; Passive antibody transfer; LSD; Humoral immunity; Secondary response; ELISA
• ISSN: 1746-6148; 1746-6148
• DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1831-y

In the presented study we investigated the development of the humoral immune response against LSDV during the process of re-vaccination of cattle over a time span of 5 months. In addition, the performance of different serological techniques for antibody detection against LSDV was compared. For sample collection, an area without previous LSD outbreak reports in Serbia was selected. Seventy-nine cattle from twenty farms vaccinated in 2016 and re-vaccinated in 2017 were included in the study. Two farms from the same area with good calving management were selected for investigation of passive LSDV antibody transfer from vaccinated mothers to new-borne calves. All investigated cattle were healthy on the day of vaccination and during the whole study. Swelling at the injection site or other side effects of vaccination did not occur after re-vaccination in the study. Detection of LSD-specific antibodies was performed with the standard serological methods VNT and IFAT as well as a commercially available Capripox double antigen multi-species-ELISA. Capripoxvirus-specific antibodies were detected 46 to 47 weeks after vaccination in 2016, with VNT in 35.06% and with IFAT and ELISA in 33.77%. A secondary response was observed in all three tests 1 month after re-vaccination with a significant increase in seropositive animals compared to the results before re-vaccination. With all applied serological methods, the number of animals testing positive was significantly higher at 1 and 5 months post re-vaccination than before re-vaccination. No significant statistical difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the results of all three tests used. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA was estimated to be Se 91% and Sp 87% calculated by the results of VNT and Se 88% and Sp 76% calculated by the results of IFAT. Passive antibody transfer from vaccinated mothers to new-born calves was investigated at 14 days after birth. Discrepancies for the detection of LSDV specific antibodies between cows and newborn calves at the age of 14 days were observed in VNT and IFAT, but not in ELISA. Of all tests used the commercially available ELISA shows to be the most useful for high throughput analysis compared to VNT or IFAT.