Preventing suicidal behaviours with a multilevel intervention: a cluster randomised controlled trial

• Published in: BMC public health Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 140
• Main Authors: Collings, Sunny, Jenkin, Gabrielle, Stanley, James, McKenzie, Sarah, Hatcher, Simon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 16.01.2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Clusters; Communities; Community involvement; Initiatives; Intervention; Medical screening; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental health care; Multilevel; Planning; Prevention; Primary care; Psychiatry; Public health; Randomization; Risk analysis; Risk factors; Self destructive behavior; Studies; Suicidal behavior; Suicide; Suicide prevention; Suicides & suicide attempts; Workshops; New Zealand; Europe; Japan
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5032-6

In the context of the recent surge in community based multilevel interventions for suicide prevention, all of which show promising results, we discuss the implications of the findings of such an intervention designed for and implemented in New Zealand. The multi-level intervention for suicide prevention in New Zealand (MISP-NZ) was a cluster randomised controlled community intervention trial involving eight hospital regions matched into four pairs and randomised to either the intervention or practice as usual (the control). Intervention regions received 25 months of interventions (01 June 2010 to 30 June 2012) including: 1) training in recognition of suicide risk factors; 2) workshops on mental health issues; 3) community based interventions (linking in with community events); and 4) distribution of print material and information on web-based resources. There was no significant difference between the change in rate of suicidal behaviours (ISH or self-inflicted deaths) in the intervention group compared with the control group (rate ratio = 1.07, 95% CI 0.82, 1.38). This study did not provide substantive evidence that the MISP-NZ intervention had an effect on suicidal behaviours raising important questions about the potential effectiveness of the multilevel intervention model for suicide prevention for all countries. Although a range of factors may account for this unanticipated finding, including inadequate study power, differences in design and intervention focus, and country-specific contextual factors, it is possible that the effectiveness of the multilevel intervention model for reducing suicidal behaviours may have been overstated. This trial was retrospectively registered on 11 April 2013. ACTRN12613000399796 .