"INTERGROWTH21st vs customized fetal growth curves in the assessment of the neonatal nutritional status: a retrospective cohort study of gestational diabetes"

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 139 - 9
• Main Authors: Fernández-Alba, Juan Jesús, Soto Pazos, Estefanía, Moreno Cortés, Rocío, Vilar Sánchez, Ángel, González Macías, Carmen, Castillo Lara, María, Moreno Corral, Luis, Sainz Bueno, José Antonio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 04.03.2020; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Anthropometry - methods; Birth Weight; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Diabetes; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Development; Fetal growth; Fetal macrosomia; Fetal Nutrition Disorders - epidemiology; Fetal Weight; Fetuses; Gestational (gestational diabetes); Gestational Age; Gestational diabetes; Growth Charts; Health risk assessment; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Newborn babies; Nutrition; Nutritional Status; Pregnancy; Prenatal development; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Small for gestational age (INFANT SGA); Spain; Spain; Fetal growth; Fetal malnutrition; Gestational (gestational diabetes); Birth weight; Diabetes; Fetal macrosomia; Infant overnutrition; Small for gestational age (INFANT SGA)
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-2845-y

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes including newborns large for gestational age, macrosomia, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, stillbirth, and neonatal morbidity. Thus, fetal growth should be monitored by ultrasound to assess for fetal overnutrition, and thereby, its clinical consequence, macrosomia. However, it is not clear which reference curve to use to define the limits of normality. Our aim is to determine which method, INTERGROWTH21st or customized curves, better identifies the nutritional status of newborns of diabetic mothers. This retrospective cohort study compared the risk of malnutrition in SGA newborns and the risk of overnutrition in LGA newborns using INTERGROWTH21st and customized birth weight references in gestational diabetes. The nutritional status of newborns was assessed using the ponderal index. Additionally, to determine the ability of both methods in the identification of neonatal malnutrition and overnutrition, we calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and likelihood ratios. Two hundred thirty-one pregnant women with GDM were included in the study. The rate of SGA indentified by INTERGROWTH21st was 4.7% vs 10.7% identified by the customized curves. The rate of LGA identified by INTERGROWTH21st was 25.6% vs 13.2% identified by the customized method. Newborns identified as SGA by the customized method showed a higher risk of malnutrition than those identified as SGA by INTERGROWTH21st. (RR 4.24 vs 2.5). LGA newborns according to the customized method also showed a higher risk of overnutrition than those classified as LGA according to INTERGROWTH21st. (RR 5.26 vs 3.57). In addition, the positive predictive value of the customized method was superior to that of INTERGROWTH21st in the identification of malnutrition (32% vs 27.27%), severe malnutrition (22.73% vs 20%), overnutrition (51.61% vs 32.20%) and severe overnutrition (28.57% vs 14.89%). In pregnant women with DMG, the ability of customized fetal growth curves to identify newborns with alterations in nutritional status appears to exceed that of INTERGROWTH21st.